These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6457078)

  • 1. Context is important but it does not explain everything: a comment on "Matching performance and the similarity structure of the stimulus set" by Crist.
    Nickerson RS
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1981 Sep; 110(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 6457078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Further analysis of the Crist data on matching performance and the similarity structure of the stimulus set.
    Pike R; Jackson K
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1983 Sep; 112(3):347-56. PubMed ID: 6225827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Putting properties of objects in context: reply to Nickerson.
    Crist WB
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1981 Sep; 110(3):303-5. PubMed ID: 6457079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Holography does not account for goodness: a critique of van der Helm and Leeuwenberg (1996).
    Olivers CN; Chater N; Watson DG
    Psychol Rev; 2004 Jan; 111(1):242-60; author reply 261-73. PubMed ID: 14756596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stimulus encoding by mentally retarded and nonretarded adults.
    Caruso DR; Detterman DK
    Am J Ment Defic; 1983 May; 87(6):649-55. PubMed ID: 6869423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceived symmetry and visual matching.
    Hershenson M; Ryder J
    Am J Psychol; 1982; 95(4):669-80. PubMed ID: 7168458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Change blindness and visual memory: visual representations get rich and act poor.
    Varakin DA; Levin DT
    Br J Psychol; 2006 Feb; 97(Pt 1):51-77. PubMed ID: 16464287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multimodal similarity and categorization of novel, three-dimensional objects.
    Cooke T; Jäkel F; Wallraven C; Bülthoff HH
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Feb; 45(3):484-95. PubMed ID: 16580027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Face recognition is affected by similarity in spatial frequency range to a greater degree than within-category object recognition.
    Collin CA; Liu CH; Troje NF; McMullen PA; Chaudhuri A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Oct; 30(5):975-87. PubMed ID: 15462634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cognitive influences on perceptual processing.
    Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 Aug; 5(3):546-62. PubMed ID: 528958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speed limits: orientation and semantic context interactions constrain natural scene discrimination dynamics.
    Rieger JW; Köchy N; Schalk F; Grüschow M; Heinze HJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Feb; 34(1):56-76. PubMed ID: 18248140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceptual encoding efficiency in visual search.
    Rauschenberger R; Yantis S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Feb; 135(1):116-31. PubMed ID: 16478320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experience, context, and the visual perception of human movement.
    Jacobs A; Pinto J; Shiffrar M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Oct; 30(5):822-35. PubMed ID: 15462623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intellectual realism: the role of children's interpretations of pictures and perceptual verbs.
    Pillow BH; Flavell JH
    Child Dev; 1985 Jun; 56(3):664-70. PubMed ID: 4006573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Valences in contextual vision.
    Herzog MH; Dependahl S; Schmonsees U; Fahle M
    Vision Res; 2004 Dec; 44(27):3131-43. PubMed ID: 15482801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Negative priming effects in children engaged in nonspatial tasks: evidence for early development of an intact inhibitory mechanism.
    Pritchard VE; Neumann E
    Dev Psychol; 2004 Mar; 40(2):191-203. PubMed ID: 14979760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors responsible for performance on the day-night task: response set or semantics?
    Simpson A; Riggs KJ
    Dev Sci; 2005 Jul; 8(4):360-71. PubMed ID: 15985070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Matching performance and the similarity structure of the stimulus set.
    Crist WB
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1981 Sep; 110(3):269-96. PubMed ID: 6457077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of stimulus properties on category construction.
    Milton F; Wills AJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Mar; 30(2):407-15. PubMed ID: 14979814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Object-position binding in visual memory for natural scenes and object arrays.
    Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):31-47. PubMed ID: 17311477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.