These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6457079)

  • 21. Rotation direction affects object recognition.
    Vuong QC; Tarr MJ
    Vision Res; 2004; 44(14):1717-30. PubMed ID: 15136006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Set size effects in the macaque striate cortex.
    Landman R; Spekreijse H; Lamme VA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):873-82. PubMed ID: 14511540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evidence for an age-independent process in category learning.
    Livingston KR; Andrews JK
    Dev Sci; 2005 Jul; 8(4):319-25. PubMed ID: 15985065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Generalization gradients and representation modes after absolute and relative discrimination learning in young chickens.
    Hauf P; Prior H; Sarris V
    Behav Processes; 2008 May; 78(1):93-9. PubMed ID: 18308484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reaction time and mild mental retardation: high speed scanning reexamined.
    Silverman W; Harris G
    Am J Ment Defic; 1982 Jul; 87(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 7124820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Category-specific effects on the identification of non-manipulable objects.
    McMullen PA; Purdy KS
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Dec; 62(3):228-40. PubMed ID: 16860450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Visual information about moving objects.
    Todd JT
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1981 Aug; 7(4):975-810. PubMed ID: 6457104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. On the generality of the contingent orienting hypothesis.
    Yeh SL; Liao HI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):157-65. PubMed ID: 18614130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Rapid size scaling in visual search.
    Champion RA; Warren PA
    Vision Res; 2008 Aug; 48(17):1820-30. PubMed ID: 18597808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Basics of the figure recognition experiment].
    Drösler J
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1980; 27(1):1-25. PubMed ID: 7385922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The development of perception and recognition of objects.
    Ruff HA
    Child Dev; 1980 Dec; 51(4):981-92. PubMed ID: 7471932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Working memory costs of task switching.
    Liefooghe B; Barrouillet P; Vandierendonck A; Camos V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):478-94. PubMed ID: 18444750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reassessing the automaticity-control distinction: item recognition as a paradigm case.
    Ryan C
    Psychol Rev; 1983 Apr; 90(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 6867218
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Scene and position specificity in visual memory for objects.
    Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):58-69. PubMed ID: 16478340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Stereoscopic shape discrimination is well preserved across changes in object size.
    Norman JF; Swindle JM; Jennings LR; Mullins EM; Beers AM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jun; 131(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 19389660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Matching performance and the similarity structure of the stimulus set.
    Crist WB
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1981 Sep; 110(3):269-96. PubMed ID: 6457077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Quantitative and structural factors in the judgment of pattern complexity.
    Ichikawa S
    Percept Psychophys; 1985 Aug; 38(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 4088801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Visual search and stimulus similarity.
    Duncan J; Humphreys GW
    Psychol Rev; 1989 Jul; 96(3):433-58. PubMed ID: 2756067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Is figural perception indeed additive?].
    Drösler J
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1986; 33(3):351-9. PubMed ID: 3751161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Stimulus repetition in studies of laterality.
    Schmuller J
    Brain Lang; 1980 May; 10(1):205-7. PubMed ID: 7378724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.