These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6457118)

  • 1. Generation of visual representations.
    Yaworsky KB; Johnson N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1981 Oct; 7(5):978-84. PubMed ID: 6457118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual and auditory coding confusability in students with and without learning disabilities.
    Hardy BW; McIntyre CW; Brown AS; North AJ
    J Learn Disabil; 1989 Dec; 22(10):646-51. PubMed ID: 2592870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recognition of letters in words and nonwords.
    Allegretti CL; Puglisi JT
    J Gen Psychol; 1982 Jul; 107(1st Half):139-48. PubMed ID: 7119756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using class-specific compound consequences to teach dictated and printed letter relations to a child with autism.
    Varella AA; de Souza DG
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015 Sep; 48(3):675-9. PubMed ID: 26173638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The P&p illusion.
    Diener D
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Jan; 47(1):65-7. PubMed ID: 2300425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Testing a queue hypothesis for the processing of global and local information.
    Navon D
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1991 Jun; 120(2):173-89. PubMed ID: 1830610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Similarity, confusability, and the density hypothesis.
    Corter JE
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1987 Sep; 116(3):238-49. PubMed ID: 2957458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Types and tokens in visual letter perception.
    Mozer MC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 May; 15(2):287-303. PubMed ID: 2525600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiple levels of stimulus representation in visual working memory.
    Shin E; Fabiani M; Gratton G
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 May; 18(5):844-58. PubMed ID: 16768382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The visual processor module and normal adult readers.
    Bigsby P
    Br J Psychol; 1988 Nov; 79 ( Pt 4)():455-69. PubMed ID: 3208001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An alternative for judging confusability of visual letters.
    Thorson G
    Percept Mot Skills; 1976 Feb; 42(1):116-8. PubMed ID: 1256962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual knowledge underlying letter perception: font-specific, schematic tuning.
    Sanocki T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1987 May; 13(2):267-78. PubMed ID: 2953856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Application of geometric models to letter recognition: distance and density.
    Appelman IB; Mayzner MS
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1982 Mar; 111(1):60-100. PubMed ID: 6460835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The familiarity effect for single-letter pairs.
    Ambler BA; Proctor JD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1976 May; 2(2):222-34. PubMed ID: 830185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Orthographic regularity, positional frequency, and visual processing of letter strings: a reply to Krueger's comments.
    Massaro DW; Venezky RL; Taylor GA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1979 Mar; 108(1):131-2. PubMed ID: 528897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Studies of letter identification using qualitative error analysis: effects of speed stress, tachistoscopic presentation, and word context.
    Stanovich KE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 Nov; 5(4):713-33. PubMed ID: 528969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of blurring and stimulus size on the lateralized processing of nonverbal stimuli.
    Michimata C; Hellige JB
    Neuropsychologia; 1987; 25(2):397-407. PubMed ID: 3601044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fast visual generation: its nature and chronometrics.
    Boles DB
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Mar; 51(3):239-46. PubMed ID: 1561049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hemisphere-specific processes in letter matching.
    Kirsner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1980 Feb; 6(1):167-79. PubMed ID: 6444990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cognitive influences on perceptual processing.
    Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 Aug; 5(3):546-62. PubMed ID: 528958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.