These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6458651)

  • 1. Effect of familiarity of Multielement matching.
    Regan JE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1981 Dec; 7(6):1273-82. PubMed ID: 6458651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The familiarity effect for single-letter pairs.
    Ambler BA; Proctor JD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1976 May; 2(2):222-34. PubMed ID: 830185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of practice, mapping, stimulus and size on string matching.
    Algarabel S; Soler MJ; Pitarque A
    Percept Mot Skills; 1987 Dec; 65(3):991-4. PubMed ID: 3438145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Familiarity effects and word unitization in visual comparison tasks.
    Marmurek HH
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jul; 17(4):483-9. PubMed ID: 2761406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Orthography and familiarity effects in word processing.
    Carr TH; Posner MI; Pollatsek A; Snyder CR
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1979 Dec; 108(4):389-414. PubMed ID: 528909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Matching performance and the similarity structure of the stimulus set.
    Crist WB
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1981 Sep; 110(3):269-96. PubMed ID: 6457077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recognition of letters in words and nonwords.
    Allegretti CL; Puglisi JT
    J Gen Psychol; 1982 Jul; 107(1st Half):139-48. PubMed ID: 7119756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Order information in multiple-element comparison.
    Angiolillo-Bent JS; Rips LJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1982 Jun; 8(3):392-406. PubMed ID: 6212630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual knowledge underlying letter perception: font-specific, schematic tuning.
    Sanocki T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1987 May; 13(2):267-78. PubMed ID: 2953856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Representation of letters when mislocation errors occur.
    Chastain G
    J Gen Psychol; 1990 Apr; 117(2):143-51. PubMed ID: 2366047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Orthographic regularity, positional frequency, and visual processing of letter strings.
    Massaro DW; Venezky RL; Taylor GA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1979 Mar; 108(1):107-24. PubMed ID: 528895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Familiarity effects in visual comparison tasks and their implications for studying human intelligence.
    Tetewsky S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1992 May; 18(3):577-94. PubMed ID: 1534357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Marijuana effects on the speed of memory retrieval in the letter-matching task.
    Block RI; Wittenborn JR
    Int J Addict; 1986 Feb; 21(2):281-5. PubMed ID: 3486840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Familiarity does not affect the unilateral field advantage for repetition detection.
    Butcher SJ; Cavanagh P
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1216-25. PubMed ID: 22532384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Same-different judgments of multiletter strings: insensitivity to positional bias and spacing.
    Proctor RW; Healy AF; Van Zandt T
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 Jan; 49(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 2011454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of practice on speed of mental rotation.
    Kail R; Park YS
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1990 Apr; 49(2):227-44. PubMed ID: 2332722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Role of visual familiarity in the word-superiority effects obtained with the simultaneous-matching task.
    Bruder GA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1978 Feb; 4(1):88-100. PubMed ID: 627853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Familiarity, spatial frequency and task determinants in processing laterally presented representations of faces.
    Glass C; Bradshaw JL; Day RH; Umiltà C
    Cortex; 1985 Dec; 21(4):513-31. PubMed ID: 4092482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Position effects in encoding briefly exposed item matrices: evidence for a reading bias or merely a matter of the selection criterion?
    Lass U; Yan S; Chen G; Becker D; Lüer G
    Psychol Res; 2008 Nov; 72(6):641-7. PubMed ID: 18841388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Some observations upon perceptual organization and the mere exposure effect.
    Todman M
    Percept Mot Skills; 1989 Aug; 69(1):147-60. PubMed ID: 2780175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.