These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6459069)
41. Superficial femoral and popliteal arteries as inflow sites for distal bypasses. Veith FJ; Gupta SK; Samson RH; Flores SW; Janko G; Scher LA Surgery; 1981 Dec; 90(6):980-90. PubMed ID: 7313952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Prospective controlled study of polytetrafluoroethylene versus saphenous vein in claudicant patients with bilateral above knee femoropopliteal bypasses. AbuRahma AF; Robinson PA; Holt SM Surgery; 1999 Oct; 126(4):594-601; discussion 601-2. PubMed ID: 10520903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Clinical experience with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (Gore-Tex) grafts for femoropopliteal arterial bypass. Shah RR; Spinazzola AJ; King JN Am J Surg; 1980 Mar; 139(3):330-2. PubMed ID: 7362001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Criteria for evaluation of new arterial prostheses by comparing vein with dacron femoropopliteal bypasses. Reichle FA Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1978 May; 146(5):714-20. PubMed ID: 148109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Revascularization of the leg using polytetrafluoroethylene: cumulative patency in patients with claudication and limb salvage. Zierler RE; Fry PD; Reid I Am J Surg; 1982 May; 143(5):549-53. PubMed ID: 7081558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Staged infrainguinal revascularization: initial prosthetic above-knee bypass followed by a distal vein bypass for recurrent ischemia. A valid concept for extending limb salvage? Rosen RC; Johnson WC; Bush HL; Cho SI; O'Hara ET; Nabseth DC Am J Surg; 1986 Aug; 152(2):224-30. PubMed ID: 3740361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The consequences of a failed femoropopliteal bypass grafting: comparison of saphenous vein and PTFE grafts. Jackson MR; Belott TP; Dickason T; Kaiser WJ; Modrall JG; Valentine RJ; Clagett GP J Vasc Surg; 2000 Sep; 32(3):498-504; 504-5. PubMed ID: 10957656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Infrapopliteal bypass for established gangrene of the forefoot or toes. Dalsing MC; White JV; Yao JS; Podrazik R; Flinn WR; Bergan JJ J Vasc Surg; 1985 Sep; 2(5):669-77. PubMed ID: 4032605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Above-knee femoropopliteal bypass grafts and the consequences of graft failure. John TG; Stonebridge PA; Kelman J; Murie JA; Jenkins AM; Ruckley CV Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1993 Jul; 75(4):257-60. PubMed ID: 8379629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Comparison between saphenous vein and Dacron Velour grafts for femoropopliteal bypass. Harris J; May J Aust N Z J Surg; 1979 Apr; 49(2):211-4. PubMed ID: 157125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The use of composite grafts in femorocrural bypasses performed for limb salvage: a review of 108 consecutive cases and comparison with 57 in situ saphenous vein bypasses. Feinberg RL; Winter RP; Wheeler JR; Gregory RT; Snyder SO; Gayle RG; Parent FN; Adcock GD J Vasc Surg; 1990 Sep; 12(3):257-63. PubMed ID: 2398584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Combined aortobifemoral and femoropopliteal bypass in the management of patients with extensive atherosclerosis. Eidt J; Charlesworth D Ann Vasc Surg; 1987 May; 1(4):453-60. PubMed ID: 2973800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Heparin-bonded Dacron or polytetrafluorethylene for femoropopliteal bypass: five-year results of a prospective randomized multicenter clinical trial. Devine C; McCollum C; J Vasc Surg; 2004 Nov; 40(5):924-31. PubMed ID: 15557906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]