These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6459408)

  • 1. The acoustic correlates of "speechlike": a use of the suffix effect.
    Morton J; Marcus SM; Ottley P
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1981 Dec; 110(4):568-93. PubMed ID: 6459408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Some evidence for 'speech' as an acoustic feature.
    Morton J; Chambers SM
    Br J Psychol; 1976 Feb; 67(1):31-45. PubMed ID: 1268450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Post-categorical processing and attenuation of the auditory suffix: evidence from both immediate and delayed suffixes.
    Miles C; Westley DP; Buller MJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1995 Sep; 89(3):261-82. PubMed ID: 7572269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Suffix interference in the recall of linguistically coherent speech.
    Balota DA; Cowan N; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 May; 16(3):446-56. PubMed ID: 2140403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Voice-specific information and the 20-second delayed-suffix effect.
    Balota DA; Duchek JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1986 Oct; 12(4):509-16. PubMed ID: 2945897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceptual organization and precategorical acoustic storage.
    Frankish C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 May; 15(3):469-479. PubMed ID: 2524546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Manipulations of irrelevant information: suffix effects with articulatory suppression and irrelevant speech.
    Surprenant AM; LeCompte DC; Neath I
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 May; 53(2):325-48. PubMed ID: 10881609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The irrelevant sound effect under articulatory suppression: is it a suffix effect?
    Hanley JR; Hayes A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):482-7. PubMed ID: 21928934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech perception by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): spoken vowels.
    Dooling RJ; Brown SD
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Jun; 47(6):568-74. PubMed ID: 2367177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Temporally nonadjacent nonlinguistic sounds affect speech categorization.
    Holt LL
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Apr; 16(4):305-12. PubMed ID: 15828978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The irrelevant sound effect under articulatory suppression is a suffix effect even with five-item lists.
    Hanley JR; Shah N
    Memory; 2012 Jul; 20(5):415-9. PubMed ID: 22497740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. English derivational suffix frequency and children's stress judgments.
    Jarmulowicz LD
    Brain Lang; 2002; 81(1-3):192-204. PubMed ID: 12081392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Duplex perception: a comparison of monosyllables and slamming doors.
    Fowler CA; Rosenblum LD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Nov; 16(4):742-54. PubMed ID: 2148589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Similarities between the irrelevant sound effect and the suffix effect.
    Hanley JR; Bourgaize J
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Aug; 46(6):841-848. PubMed ID: 29600481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perception of dynamic information for vowels in syllable onsets and offsets.
    Jenkins JJ; Strange W
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 Aug; 61(6):1200-10. PubMed ID: 10497437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. "Semantic" and "acoustic" errors of aphasic and schizophrenic patients in a sound-picture matching task.
    Strohner H; Cohen R; Kelter S; Woll G
    Cortex; 1978 Sep; 14(3):391-403. PubMed ID: 710149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sound-producing sources as objects of perception: rate normalization and nonspeech perception.
    Fowler CA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Sep; 88(3):1236-49. PubMed ID: 2229661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Some effects of filtered contexts on the perception of vowels and fricatives.
    Watkins AJ; Makin SJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Jan; 99(1):588-94. PubMed ID: 8568046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recency and suffix effects in serial recall of musical stimuli.
    Greene RL; Samuel AG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1986 Oct; 12(4):517-24. PubMed ID: 2945898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differential effects of repetition on pre- and postcategorical memory traces.
    Dalezman JJ; Shulman HG
    Mem Cognit; 1974 Mar; 2(2):306-8. PubMed ID: 24214760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.