162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6459766)
1. Comparative activity of mezlocillin, penicillin, ampicillin, carbenicillin, and ticarcillin against gram-positive bacteria and Haemophilus influenzae.
Sanders CC
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1981 Dec; 20(6):843-6. PubMed ID: 6459766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Susceptibility of ampicillin-resistant Haemophilus influenzae to seven penicillins.
Thornsberry C; Baker CN; Kirven LA; Swenson JM
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1976 Jan; 9(1):70-3. PubMed ID: 1083202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Apalcillin: in vitro activity compared with that of carbenicillin, ticarcillin, mezlocillin, piperacillin against Enterobacteriaceae and Acinetobacter].
Quentin C; Sageaux JC; Bebear C; Latrille J
Pathol Biol (Paris); 1983 Jun; 31(6):463-6. PubMed ID: 6224123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro activity of piperacillin compared with that of ampicillin, ticarcillin, azlocillin, and mezlocillin.
Machka K; Dickert H; Braveny I
Arzneimittelforschung; 1980; 30(2):304-7. PubMed ID: 6445735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro activity of mezlocillin and azlocillin compared with that of four other penicillins and two aminoglycosides.
Barry AL; Thornsberry C; Jones RN; Gavan TL
Cleve Clin Q; 1980; 47(4):311-9. PubMed ID: 6451334
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparative in vitro activity of 5 semi-synthetic penicillins against aerobic Gram-negative bacilli and enterococci (author's transl)].
Thabaut A; Durosoir JL; Saliou P
Nouv Presse Med; 1982 Feb; 11(5 Pt 2):318-23. PubMed ID: 6460967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro activity of ticarcillin, carbenicillin and ampicillin against some gram-negative bacilli.
Legakis NJ; Papavassiliou J
J Antibiot (Tokyo); 1975 Nov; 28(11):912-9. PubMed ID: 811636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Azlocillin, mezlocillin, and piperacillin: new broad-spectrum penicillins.
Eliopoulos GM; Moellering RC
Ann Intern Med; 1982 Nov; 97(5):755-60. PubMed ID: 6215872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative in vitro antibacterial activity of seven semi-synthetic penicillins against aerobic gram-negative bacteria and enterococci.
Thabaut A; Durosoir JL; Saliou P
Infection; 1982; 10 Suppl 3():S249-56. PubMed ID: 7152690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative in vitro activity of azlocillin, ampicillin, mezlocillin, piperacillin, and ticarcillin, alone and in combination with an aminoglycoside.
White GW; Malow JB; Zimelis VM; Pahlavanzadeh H; Panwalker AP; Jackson GG
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1979 Apr; 15(4):540-3. PubMed ID: 111616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Antimicrobial therapy of postpartum endomyometritis. I. Comparative susceptibility of mezlocillin and other antibiotics to genital anaerobic bacteria.
Sorrell TC; Marshall JR; Chow AW
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Oct; 141(3):242-5. PubMed ID: 6456667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative antibacterial activity of azlocillin, mezlocillin, carbenicillin and ticarcillin and relative stability to beta-lactamases of pseudomonas aeruginosa and klebsiella aerogenes.
Basker MJ; Edmondson RA; Sutherland R
Infection; 1979; 7(2):67-73. PubMed ID: 108220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro activity of ticarcillin against anaerobic bacteria compared with that of carbenicillin and penicillin.
Roy I; Bach V; Thadepalli H
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1977 Feb; 11(2):258-61. PubMed ID: 848931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Activity of azlocillin and mezlocillin against gram-negative organisms: comparison with other penicillins.
Wise R; Gillett AP; Andrews JM; Bedford KA
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1978 Apr; 13(4):559-65. PubMed ID: 96726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro susceptibility of 104 clinical isolates of Haemophilus influenzae to moxalactam (LY127935), ampicillin, chloramphenicol, and ticarcillin.
Mason EO; Kaplan SL; Anderson DC; Hinds DB; Feigin RD
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1980 Mar; 17(3):470-3. PubMed ID: 6448579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the activities of the new ureidopenicillins piperacillin, mezlocillin, azlocillin, and Bay k 4999 against gram-negative organisms.
Verbist L
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1979 Aug; 16(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 485123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative activity and beta-lactamase stability of carbenicillin, ticarcillin, azlocillin, mezlocillin and cefotaxime.
Tselentis J; Cordossis T; Kosmidis J; Lambropoulos S; Melissinos K
J Antimicrob Chemother; 1981 Oct; 8(4):317-21. PubMed ID: 6271725
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro activity of furazlocillin (Bay k 4999) compared with those of mezlocillin, piperacillin, and standard beta-lactam antibiotics.
Gootz TD; Sanders CC; Sanders WE
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1979 Jun; 15(6):783-91. PubMed ID: 475364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Amoxicillin: in vitro susceptibility of "blood culture strains" of gram-negative bacilli and comparisons with penicillin G ampicillin, and carbenicillin.
Finland M; McGowan JE; Garner C; Wilcox C
J Infect Dis; 1974 Jun; 129(0):suppl:S132-8. PubMed ID: 4210005
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro activity of piperacillin compared with that of carbenicillin, ticarcillin, ampicillin, cephalothin, and cefamandole against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae.
Shah PP; Briedis DJ; Robson HG; Conterato JP
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1979 Mar; 15(3):346-50. PubMed ID: 111609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
