These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6459970)

  • 21. Effect of low-viscosity resins on the performance of dental adhesives.
    Swift EJ; Triolo PT; Barkmeier WW; Bird JL; Bounds SJ
    Am J Dent; 1996 Jun; 9(3):100-4. PubMed ID: 9002798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations using five simplified adhesive systems.
    Cardoso PE; Placido E; Francci CE; Perdigão J
    Am J Dent; 1999 Dec; 12(6):291-4. PubMed ID: 10850249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Clinical trial of G-Bond all-in-one adhesive and Gradia Direct resin composite in non-carious cervical lesions-results at 1 year.
    Burrow MF; Tyas MJ
    J Dent; 2007 Jul; 35(7):623-5. PubMed ID: 17548143
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comparative analysis of techniques of restoring cervical lesions.
    Sidhu SK
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Aug; 24(8):553-9. PubMed ID: 8272493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A randomized controlled clinical trial of a HEMA-free all-in-one adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions at 1 year.
    Van Landuyt KL; Peumans M; Fieuws S; De Munck J; Cardoso MV; Ermis RB; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B
    J Dent; 2008 Oct; 36(10):847-55. PubMed ID: 18656295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of composite resin-to-porcelain bond strength with three adhesives.
    Kelsey WP; Latta MA; Stanislav CM; Shaddy RS
    Gen Dent; 2000; 48(4):418-21. PubMed ID: 11199616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Clinical long-term retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. A 13 years evaluation.
    van Dijken JW; Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K; Lindberg A
    Dent Mater; 2007 Sep; 23(9):1101-7. PubMed ID: 17113139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The influence of a packable resin composite, conventional resin composite and amalgam on molar cuspal stiffness.
    Molinaro JD; Diefenderfer KE; Strother JM
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):516-24. PubMed ID: 12216572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Self-etch vs etch-and-rinse adhesives: effect of thermo-mechanical fatigue loading on marginal quality of bonded resin composite restorations.
    Frankenberger R; Tay FR
    Dent Mater; 2005 May; 21(5):397-412. PubMed ID: 15826696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with indirect composite resins: the effect of alternative luting procedures.
    Burke FJ; Wilson NH; Watts DC
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Apr; 25(4):269-75. PubMed ID: 8058900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Fracture resistance of reattached incisor fragments with mini fibre-reinforced composite anchors.
    Fennis WM; Kreulen CM; Wolke JG; Fokkinga WA; Machado C; Creugers NH
    J Dent; 2009 Jun; 37(6):462-7. PubMed ID: 19339099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Restoration of cervical lesions caused by toothbrushing].
    Onose H; Ando S
    Shikai Tenbo; 1983; Spec Is():152-61. PubMed ID: 6575455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Transurgical restoration in the absence of attached gingiva. A case report.
    da Silva Pereira SL; Ximenes SR; Moreira DM; Costa AP
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Jan; 35(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 14765639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Microleakage of cervical restorations using two resin bonding systems.
    Owens BM; Kaplan I; Gilpatrick RO
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1995 Jan; 75(1):36-9. PubMed ID: 9520779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Microleakage of class 2 Superbond-lined composite restorations with and without a cervical amalgam base.
    Hovav S; Holan G; Lewinstein I; Fuks AB
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(2):63-7. PubMed ID: 8700773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Microleakage of cervical cavities restored with flowable composites.
    Kubo S; Yokota H; Yokota H; Hayashi Y
    Am J Dent; 2004 Feb; 17(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 15241907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. In vivo assessment of four composite resins: a one year report.
    Berry TG; Osborne JW
    J Colo Dent Assoc; 1986; 65(2):5-6. PubMed ID: 2945838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effect of different drying methods for single step adhesive systems on microleakage of tooth colored restorations.
    Owens BM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2003 Feb; 4(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 12595929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparative in vivo and in vitro investigation of interfacial bond variability.
    Hannig M; Friedrichs C
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 11203774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dentin bonding, caries control.
    Swift EJ
    J Esthet Dent; 2000; 12(5):236-7. PubMed ID: 11338489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.