BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6460701)

  • 1. The sensitivity of prospective hospital reimbursement to errors in patient data.
    Corn RF
    Inquiry; 1981; 18(4):351-60. PubMed ID: 6460701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Commentary: DRG--the executive director's view.
    Maressa VA
    J Med Soc N J; 1984 May; 81(5):409-10. PubMed ID: 6433025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adjusting to Medicare DRG indexes and target ceilings.
    Grimaldi PL
    Hosp Prog; 1983 Jan; 64(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 10309793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnosis-related groups: physician and abstractor reliability and financial significance of errors.
    Bindman AB; Eichenfield LF; Geller SA
    Mt Sinai J Med; 1984 Jun; 51(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 6431272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Commentary: DRG--New Jersey and the federal system.
    Rineberg BA
    J Med Soc N J; 1984 May; 81(5):406-8. PubMed ID: 6433024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of DRGs--selected implications for medical record departments.
    Grimaldi PL; Micheletti JA; Zipkas MM
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1983 Feb; 54(2):24-30. PubMed ID: 10309862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prospective payment system.
    Cofer J
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1983 Apr; 54(4):17-8. PubMed ID: 10309939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using medical records to ensure fair DRG reimbursement.
    Ray WJ; Johnstone J
    Comput Healthc; 1983 Dec; 4(12):32-6, 40. PubMed ID: 10310306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The hospital's financial future: DRGs and beyond.
    Beck DF
    Health Care Superv; 1985 Jan; 3(2):1-10. PubMed ID: 10311067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-per-case reimbursement: a challenge to hospital management.
    Bassett JG
    Top Health Rec Manage; 1984 Mar; 4(3):1-9. PubMed ID: 10310487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospective payment strategy--is it working?
    Fifer WR
    Pa Med; 1984 Dec; 87(12):38-42. PubMed ID: 6440095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does severity of illness make a difference in prospective payment?
    Horn SD
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1983 May; 37(5):49-53. PubMed ID: 10315319
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A positive first step: prospective payment by DRG.
    Averill RF; Kalison MJ
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1983 Feb; 37(2):12-4, 18-22. PubMed ID: 10315273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prospective payment set for complex phase-in.
    Albertson D
    Med Prod Sales; 1983 May; 14(5):45-6. PubMed ID: 10309960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. DRG helper makes it easy for doctors to maximize reimbursement.
    Hosp Forum; 1984; 27(4):62-3. PubMed ID: 10310692
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The fact book on prospective payment. Health industry Manufacturers Association.
    Med Prod Sales; 1983 Jun; 14(6):68-71, 94-103. PubMed ID: 10310091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methodological limitations in case mix hospital reimbursement, with a proposal for change.
    Williams SV; Kominski GF; Dowd BE; Soper KA
    Inquiry; 1984; 21(1):17-31. PubMed ID: 6232213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Calculating DRG-based Medicare payment rates.
    Grimaldi PL
    Hosp Prog; 1983 Oct; 64(10):72-5, 80, 82. PubMed ID: 10310271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perspectives. Paying physicians differently, Part two.
    Wash Rep Med Health; 1985 Feb; 39(8):suppl 4p. PubMed ID: 10311043
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perspectives. Paying physicians differently, Part one.
    Wash Rep Med Health; 1985 Feb; 39(7):suppl 4p. PubMed ID: 10311042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.