235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6460701)
1. The sensitivity of prospective hospital reimbursement to errors in patient data.
Corn RF
Inquiry; 1981; 18(4):351-60. PubMed ID: 6460701
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Commentary: DRG--the executive director's view.
Maressa VA
J Med Soc N J; 1984 May; 81(5):409-10. PubMed ID: 6433025
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Adjusting to Medicare DRG indexes and target ceilings.
Grimaldi PL
Hosp Prog; 1983 Jan; 64(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 10309793
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnosis-related groups: physician and abstractor reliability and financial significance of errors.
Bindman AB; Eichenfield LF; Geller SA
Mt Sinai J Med; 1984 Jun; 51(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 6431272
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Commentary: DRG--New Jersey and the federal system.
Rineberg BA
J Med Soc N J; 1984 May; 81(5):406-8. PubMed ID: 6433024
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The use of DRGs--selected implications for medical record departments.
Grimaldi PL; Micheletti JA; Zipkas MM
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1983 Feb; 54(2):24-30. PubMed ID: 10309862
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective payment system.
Cofer J
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1983 Apr; 54(4):17-8. PubMed ID: 10309939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Using medical records to ensure fair DRG reimbursement.
Ray WJ; Johnstone J
Comput Healthc; 1983 Dec; 4(12):32-6, 40. PubMed ID: 10310306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The hospital's financial future: DRGs and beyond.
Beck DF
Health Care Superv; 1985 Jan; 3(2):1-10. PubMed ID: 10311067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-per-case reimbursement: a challenge to hospital management.
Bassett JG
Top Health Rec Manage; 1984 Mar; 4(3):1-9. PubMed ID: 10310487
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective payment strategy--is it working?
Fifer WR
Pa Med; 1984 Dec; 87(12):38-42. PubMed ID: 6440095
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Does severity of illness make a difference in prospective payment?
Horn SD
Healthc Financ Manage; 1983 May; 37(5):49-53. PubMed ID: 10315319
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A positive first step: prospective payment by DRG.
Averill RF; Kalison MJ
Healthc Financ Manage; 1983 Feb; 37(2):12-4, 18-22. PubMed ID: 10315273
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective payment set for complex phase-in.
Albertson D
Med Prod Sales; 1983 May; 14(5):45-6. PubMed ID: 10309960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. DRG helper makes it easy for doctors to maximize reimbursement.
Hosp Forum; 1984; 27(4):62-3. PubMed ID: 10310692
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The fact book on prospective payment. Health industry Manufacturers Association.
Med Prod Sales; 1983 Jun; 14(6):68-71, 94-103. PubMed ID: 10310091
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Methodological limitations in case mix hospital reimbursement, with a proposal for change.
Williams SV; Kominski GF; Dowd BE; Soper KA
Inquiry; 1984; 21(1):17-31. PubMed ID: 6232213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Calculating DRG-based Medicare payment rates.
Grimaldi PL
Hosp Prog; 1983 Oct; 64(10):72-5, 80, 82. PubMed ID: 10310271
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Perspectives. Paying physicians differently, Part two.
Wash Rep Med Health; 1985 Feb; 39(8):suppl 4p. PubMed ID: 10311043
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Perspectives. Paying physicians differently, Part one.
Wash Rep Med Health; 1985 Feb; 39(7):suppl 4p. PubMed ID: 10311042
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]