1021 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6460854)
1. A comparison of bone imaging with Tc-99m DPD and Tc-99m MDP: concise communication.
Buell U; Kleinhans E; Zorn-Bopp E; Reuschel W; Muenzing W; Moser EA; Seiderer M
J Nucl Med; 1982 Mar; 23(3):214-7. PubMed ID: 6460854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Technetium-99m MDP vs technetium-99m dicarboxypropane diphosphonate. A clinical comparison in various pathologic conditions.
Godart G; Durez M; Bevilacqua M; Abramovici J; Robience Y
Clin Nucl Med; 1986 Feb; 11(2):92-7. PubMed ID: 3769350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 99Tcm-MDP and 99Tcm-DPD in pathologic bone lesions. A visual and quantitative comparison.
Lantto T; Vorne M; Mokka R; Vähätalo S
Acta Radiol; 1987; 28(5):631-3. PubMed ID: 2960361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computer analysis of Tc-99m DPD and Tc-99m MDP kinetics in humans: concise communication.
Mele M; Conte E; Fratello A; Pasculli D; Pieralice M; D'Addabbo A
J Nucl Med; 1983 Apr; 24(4):334-8. PubMed ID: 6834136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A clinical comparison of 99mTc-DPD and two 99mTc-MDP agents.
Vorne M; Vähätalo S; Lantto T
Eur J Nucl Med; 1983; 8(9):395-7. PubMed ID: 6226527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biokinetics of bone tracers by means of deconvolution analysis--comparison of 99mTc MDP, 99mTc DPD and 99mTc EHDP.
Knop J; Stritzke P; Kröger E; Schneider C; Wasmus G
Nuklearmedizin; 1982 Aug; 21(4):145-9. PubMed ID: 6216459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. New diphosphonate compounds for skeletal imaging: comparison with methylene diphosphonate.
Subramanian G; McAfee JG; Thomas FD; Feld TA; Zapf-Longo C; Palladino E
Radiology; 1983 Dec; 149(3):823-8. PubMed ID: 6316414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of tc-99m MDP, HMDP, and DPD with respect to bone-to-soft tissue ratios.
Buell U; Kirsch CM; Kleinhans E; Jäger B
J Nucl Med; 1983 Dec; 24(12):1201-2. PubMed ID: 6227711
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison between the diagnostic efficacy of 99mTc-MDP, 99mTc-DPD and 99mTc-HDP for the detection of bone metastases.
Pauwels EK; Blom J; Camps JA; Hermans J; Rijke AM
Eur J Nucl Med; 1983; 8(3):118-22. PubMed ID: 6220908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Which diphosphonate for routine bone scintigraphy (MDP, HDP or DPD)?
Frühling J; Verbist A; Balikdjian D
Nucl Med Commun; 1986 Jun; 7(6):415-25. PubMed ID: 3748485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relative lesion detection ability of Tc-99m HMDP and Tc-99m MDP: concise communication.
Van Duzee BF; Schaefer JA; Ball JD; Chilton HM; Cowan RJ; Kuni C; Trow R; Watson NE
J Nucl Med; 1984 Feb; 25(2):166-9. PubMed ID: 6233404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Technetium-99m-labeled methylene diphosphonate and hydroxyethylidine diphosphonate--biologic and clinical comparison: concise communication.
Rudd TG; Allen DR; Smith FD
J Nucl Med; 1979 Aug; 20(8):821-6. PubMed ID: 120422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A clinical comparison of MDP and DMAD.
Rosenthall L; Stern J; Arzoumanian A
Clin Nucl Med; 1982 Sep; 7(9):403-6. PubMed ID: 6214358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is (99m)Tc-labelled pamidronate a better agent than (99m)Tc-medronate for bone imaging?
Kumar V; Kumar D; Howman-Giles RB; Little DG
Nucl Med Commun; 2007 Feb; 28(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 17198350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A clinical comparison of Tc-99m HEDP and Tc-99m MDP in the detection of bone metastases: concise communication.
Fogelman I; Citrin DL; McKillop JH; Turner JG; Bessent RG; Greig WR
J Nucl Med; 1979 Feb; 20(2):98-101. PubMed ID: 430202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tc-99m HMDP (hydroxymethylene diphosphonate): a radiopharmaceutical for skeletal and acute myocardial infarct imaging. II. Comparison of Tc-99m hydroxymethylene diphosphonate (HMDP) with other technetium-labeled bone-imaging agents in a canine model.
Bevan JA; Tofe AJ; Benedict JJ; Francis MD; Barnett BL
J Nucl Med; 1980 Oct; 21(10):967-70. PubMed ID: 6252299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tc-99m hydroxymethylene diphosphonate and Tc-99m methylene diphosphonate: biological and clinical comparison: concise communication.
Littlefield JL; Rudd TG
J Nucl Med; 1983 Jun; 24(6):463-6. PubMed ID: 6222166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Clinical studies on bone deposition of 99mTc-labeled-DPD (dicarboxypropane diphosphonate): a comparison with 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate].
Otsuka N; Yoneda M; Sawai M; Saito J; Nagai K; Muranaka A; Terashima H; Yanagimoto S; Ito Y
Kaku Igaku; 1982 Dec; 19(10):1573-8. PubMed ID: 6221135
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of skeletal uptakes of three diphosphonates by whole-body retention: concise communication.
Fogelman I; Pearson DW; Bessent RG; Tofe AJ; Francis MD
J Nucl Med; 1981 Oct; 22(10):880-3. PubMed ID: 6457135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical evaluation of a technetium-99m bone imaging agent based on the vicinal diphosphonate 1,2-diphosphonoethyleneglycol (DPEG).
Pauwels EK; Camps JA; Blom J; Hermans J; Kelly JD; Cumming SA; Blackburn GM; Rashid A
Nucl Med Commun; 1985 Nov; 6(11):739-45. PubMed ID: 3831848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
