These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6462563)

  • 21. Evaluation of nonstress fetal heart rate testing in multiple gestations.
    Blake GD; Knuppel RA; Ingardia CJ; Lake M; Aumann G; Hanson M
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Apr; 63(4):528-32. PubMed ID: 6700901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Outcomes of congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a population-based study in Western Australia.
    Colvin J; Bower C; Dickinson JE; Sokol J
    Pediatrics; 2005 Sep; 116(3):e356-63. PubMed ID: 16140678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The application of multiple-parameter scoring to antepartum fetal heart rate testing.
    Devoe LD; Yanowitch G; Azor H
    J Reprod Med; 1981 May; 26(5):250-4. PubMed ID: 7252938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Nonstress test prediction of fetal status.
    Gandhi J; Gugliucci CL
    J Reprod Med; 1982 Feb; 27(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 7097665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Conditions affecting nonstress test results.
    Rayburn WF; Motley ME; Zuspan FP
    Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Apr; 59(4):490-3. PubMed ID: 7078903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Contraction stress test after hyperstimulation patterns during antepartum fetal heart rate monitoring.
    Elliott JP; Barry MK
    J Reprod Med; 1988 Sep; 33(9):761-4. PubMed ID: 3172082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Use of nipple stimulation to obtain contraction stress test.
    Lenke RR; Nemes JM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Mar; 63(3):345-8. PubMed ID: 6700857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Contraction stress test versus ductus venosus Doppler evaluation for the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome in growth-restricted fetuses with non-reassuring non-stress test.
    Figueras F; Martínez JM; Puerto B; Coll O; Cararach V; Vanrell JA
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Mar; 21(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12666219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Relationship of nonstress test reactivity and gestational age.
    Lavin JP; Miodovnik M; Barden TP
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Mar; 63(3):338-44. PubMed ID: 6700856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Pregnancy outcome in the patient with a nonreactive nonstress test and a positive contraction stress test.
    Slomka C; Phelan JP
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Jan; 139(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 7457512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Further experience with the fetal biophysical profile.
    Platt LD; Eglinton GS; Sipos L; Broussard PM; Paul RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Apr; 61(4):480-5. PubMed ID: 6681892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Antepartum fetal heart testing: a clinical appraisal.
    Goldkrand JW; Benjamin DS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Jan; 63(1):48-51. PubMed ID: 6691017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Characteristics of uterine activity during the breast stimulation stress test.
    Hill WC; Moenning RK; Katz M; Kitzmiller JL
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Oct; 64(4):489-92. PubMed ID: 6483296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical sequelae of the extended nonstress test.
    Devoe LD; McKenzie J; Searle NS; Sherline DM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Apr; 151(8):1074-8. PubMed ID: 3985067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The nonreactive nonstress test: predictive value for neonatal anemia in the isoimmunized pregnancy.
    Ouzounian JG; Alsulyman OM; Monteiro HA; Songster GS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Sep; 88(3):364-7. PubMed ID: 8752240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A randomized trial of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation.
    Vintzileos AM; Antsaklis A; Varvarigos I; Papas C; Sofatzis I; Montgomery JT
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):899-907. PubMed ID: 8497353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Parameters associated with adverse perinatal outcome in hypertensive pregnancies.
    Shah DM; Reed G
    J Hum Hypertens; 1996 Aug; 10(8):511-5. PubMed ID: 8895034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Maternal and perinatal outcome in pregnancies complicated with hypertensive disorder of pregnancy: a seven year experience of a tertiary care center.
    Yücesoy G; Ozkan S; Bodur H; Tan T; Calişkan E; Vural B; Corakçi A
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2005 Nov; 273(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 15834580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Routine ultrasound for detection and management of the small-for-gestational-age fetus.
    Hughey MJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Jul; 64(1):101-7. PubMed ID: 6738932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Nonstress testing and perinatal outcome.
    Rayburn W; Greene J; Donaldson M
    J Reprod Med; 1980 May; 24(5):191-6. PubMed ID: 7401050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.