These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6462869)

  • 1. On the perception of intonation from sinusoidal sentences.
    Remez RE; Rubin PE
    Percept Psychophys; 1984 May; 35(5):429-40. PubMed ID: 6462869
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the intonation of sinusoidal sentences: contour and pitch height.
    Remez RE; Rubin PE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Oct; 94(4):1983-8. PubMed ID: 8227742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptual normalization of vowels produced by sinusoidal voices.
    Remez RE; Rubin PE; Nygaard LC; Howell WA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1987 Feb; 13(1):40-61. PubMed ID: 2951488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The frequency scale of speech intonation.
    Hermes DJ; van Gestel JC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jul; 90(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 1831823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The auditory tau and kappa effects for speech and nonspeech stimuli.
    Shigeno S
    Percept Psychophys; 1986 Jul; 40(1):9-19. PubMed ID: 3748768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. "Acoustic" parameters of front vowels.
    Zhukov SYa ; Chistovich LA
    Hum Physiol; 1985; 11(3):165-70. PubMed ID: 4093143
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech pattern hearing aids for the profoundly hearing impaired: speech perception and auditory abilities.
    Faulkner A; Ball V; Rosen S; Moore BC; Fourcin A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2136-55. PubMed ID: 1597605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Brain activity varies with modulation of dynamic pitch variance in sentence melody.
    Meyer M; Steinhauer K; Alter K; Friederici AD; von Cramon DY
    Brain Lang; 2004 May; 89(2):277-89. PubMed ID: 15068910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Grouping of vowel harmonics by frequency modulation: absence of effects on phonemic categorization.
    Gardner RB; Darwin CJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1986 Sep; 40(3):183-7. PubMed ID: 3774502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perception of pitch movement on tonic syllables in British English.
    Ainsworth WA; Lindsay D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Feb; 79(2):472-80. PubMed ID: 3950201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparative assessment of speech sound discrimination in the Mongolian gerbil.
    Sinnott JM; Mosteller KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Oct; 110(4):1729-32. PubMed ID: 11681351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Categorical perception of intonation contrasts: effects of listeners' language background.
    Liu C; Rodriguez A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jun; 131(6):EL427-33. PubMed ID: 22713017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of speech intonation production and perception abilities of Farsi speaking cochlear implanted and normal hearing children.
    Moein N; Khoddami SM; Shahbodaghi MR
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Oct; 101():1-6. PubMed ID: 28964276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. When pitch Accents Encode Speaker Commitment: Evidence from French Intonation.
    Michelas A; Portes C; Champagne-Lavau M
    Lang Speech; 2016 Jun; 59(Pt 2):266-93. PubMed ID: 27363256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Beyond sentence prosody: paragraph intonation in Dutch.
    Sluijter AM; Terken JM
    Phonetica; 1993; 50(3):180-8. PubMed ID: 8295926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Talker information influences spectral contrast effects in speech categorization.
    Assgari AA; Stilp CE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Nov; 138(5):3023-32. PubMed ID: 26627776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hypernasal Speech Is Perceived as More Monotonous than Typical Speech.
    Tardif M; Berti LC; Marino VCC; Pardo J; Bressmann T
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2018; 70(3-4):183-190. PubMed ID: 30184539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mistuning a harmonic of a vowel: grouping and phase effects on vowel quality.
    Darwin CJ; Gardner RB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Mar; 79(3):838-45. PubMed ID: 3958326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Coding pitch differences in voiceless fricatives: Whispered relative to normal speech.
    Heeren WF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3427-38. PubMed ID: 26723300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The shape of nuclear falls and their effect on the perception of pitch and prominence: peaks vs. plateaux.
    Knight RA
    Lang Speech; 2008; 51(Pt 3):223-44. PubMed ID: 19626925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.