These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 646297)

  • 1. Earmold configuration: relation to speech discrimination scores.
    Epstein A; Shoenut B; Sills JA
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1978; 87(2 Pt 1):260-5. PubMed ID: 646297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relief of the occluded ear sensation to improve earmold comfort.
    French-Saint George M; Barr-Hamilton RM
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1978; 4(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 721670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Monitoring of hearing aids and earmolds in an educational setting.
    Riedner ED
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1978; 4(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 721671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Filter effect of earmold venting: comparison of electroacoustic and psychoacoustic methods of evaluation.
    Franks JR; Cooper WA; McFall RN
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1977; 3(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 893203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A modified polymer foam earplug for the hearing aid evaluation.
    Gerling IJ; Roeser RJ
    Ear Hear; 1981; 2(2):82-7. PubMed ID: 7227678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maximum usable real-ear insertion gain with ten earmold designs.
    Kuk FK
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1994 Jan; 5(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 8155894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of earmold type on ability to locate sounds when wearing hearing aids.
    Byrne D; Noble W; Glauerdt B
    Ear Hear; 1996 Jun; 17(3):218-28. PubMed ID: 8807264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of vent effects between a solid earmold and a hollow earmold.
    Kuk F; Keenan D; Lau CC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 Sep; 20(8):480-91. PubMed ID: 19764168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Effect of venting the ear mold on speech discrimination in masking noise].
    Brügel FJ; Schorn K; Fastl H
    HNO; 1991 Sep; 39(9):356-61. PubMed ID: 1748579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Frequency responses of hearing aids and their effects on the speech perception of hearing-impaired subjects.
    Pascoe DP
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1975; 84(5 pt 2 Suppl 23):1-40. PubMed ID: 1180471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Earmold modification effect measured by coupler, threshold and probe techniques.
    Studebaker GA; Cox RM; Wark DJ
    Audiology; 1978; 17(2):173-86. PubMed ID: 646735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Earmold options for wideband hearing aids.
    Killion MC
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1981 Feb; 46(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 7206671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Waveguide model of the hearing aid earmold system.
    Szwoch G; Kostek B
    Diagn Pathol; 2006 May; 1():6. PubMed ID: 16759359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attenuation characteristics of hearing aid earmolds.
    Frank T
    Ear Hear; 1980; 1(3):161-6. PubMed ID: 7390074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Occlusion and coupling effects with different earmold designs - all a matter of opening the ear canal?
    Denk F; Hieke T; Roberz M; Husstedt H
    Int J Audiol; 2023 Mar; 62(3):227-237. PubMed ID: 35254186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development and preliminary evaluation of an earmold sound-to-tactile aid for the hearing-impaired.
    Weisenberger JM; Heidbreder AF; Miller JD
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(2):51-66. PubMed ID: 3585784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing.
    Gantz BJ; Turner C; Gfeller KE; Lowder MW
    Laryngoscope; 2005 May; 115(5):796-802. PubMed ID: 15867642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of signal processing on intelligibility of speech in noise for persons with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Yanick P
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1976; 1(5):229-38. PubMed ID: 956011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech recognition in noise using bilateral open-fit hearing aids: the limited benefit of directional microphones and noise reduction.
    Magnusson L; Claesson A; Persson M; Tengstrand T
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jan; 52(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 22928919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using genetic algorithms with subjective input from human subjects: implications for fitting hearing aids and cochlear implants.
    Başkent D; Eiler CL; Edwards B
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):370-80. PubMed ID: 17485986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.