These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 646297)
21. Effect of age on clinical hearing aid evaluation results. Surr RK J Am Audiol Soc; 1977; 3(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 893193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effects of tubing length and coupling method on hearing threshold and real-ear to coupler difference measures. Gustafson S; Pittman A; Fanning R Am J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 22(1):190-9. PubMed ID: 23800818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Advances in earmold technology: one-stage (direct) approach. Okpojo AO J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 Mar; 3(2):142-4. PubMed ID: 1600216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Signal delivery/real ear measurement system for hearing aid selection and fitting. Zelisko DL; Seewald RC; Gagné JP Ear Hear; 1992 Dec; 13(6):460-3. PubMed ID: 1342584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Active middle ear implant compared with open-fit hearing aid in sloping high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss. Boeheim K; Pok SM; Schloegel M; Filzmoser P Otol Neurotol; 2010 Apr; 31(3):424-9. PubMed ID: 20042907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Binaural hearing spectacles with "no mould" by acoustic trauma. Lund O; Høyvik H Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1979; 360():113-5. PubMed ID: 287318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Radio frequency clipping in hearing aids. Bradley PJ Br J Audiol; 1977 Aug; 11(3):69-74. PubMed ID: 922229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Lexical tone and word recognition in noise of Mandarin-speaking children who use cochlear implants and hearing aids in opposite ears. Yuen KC; Cao KL; Wei CG; Luan L; Li H; Zhang ZY Cochlear Implants Int; 2009; 10 Suppl 1():120-9. PubMed ID: 19195003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The effects of hearing aid use on listening effort and mental fatigue associated with sustained speech processing demands. Hornsby BW Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):523-34. PubMed ID: 23426091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Methods for the evaluation of hearing aids. Levitt H Scand Audiol Suppl; 1978; (6):199-240. PubMed ID: 292143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Protocol for evaluation of the effect of hearing aid electroacoustic parameters on perception of amplified speech. Lawrence DW; Blackledge VO J Am Audiol Soc; 1977; 2(6):197-201. PubMed ID: 893188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. An earmold for the geriatric patient. Navarro MR J Speech Hear Disord; 1977 Feb; 42(1):44-6. PubMed ID: 839754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of the earmold on speech intelligibility in hearing aid use. Hodgson WR; Murdock C J Speech Hear Res; 1970 Jun; 13(2):290-7. PubMed ID: 5421448 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [What improvements can be gained by additional boring in hearing aid fitting?]. Brügel FJ; Schorn K; Hofer R Laryngorhinootologie; 1992 Feb; 71(2):79-82. PubMed ID: 1571059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The effect of fitting formulas in programmable hearing aids on speech discrimination in noise. Dündar SE; Aksoy S Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg; 2007; 17(5):278-82. PubMed ID: 18187987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Clinical outcomes for adult cochlear implant recipients experiencing loss of usable acoustic hearing in the implanted ear. Plant KL; van Hoesel RJ; McDermott HJ; Dawson PW; Cowan RS Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):338-56. PubMed ID: 25474417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]