209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6463317)
1. [Isolated aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthesis. Results after an 8-years follow-up].
Zueco J; Gallo I; Revuelta JM
Rev Esp Cardiol; 1984; 37(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 6463317
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The homograft aortic valve: a 29-year, 99.3% follow up of 1,022 valve replacements.
O'Brien MF; Harrocks S; Stafford EG; Gardner MA; Pohlner PG; Tesar PJ; Stephens F
J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 May; 10(3):334-44; discussion 335. PubMed ID: 11380096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Experience with low-dose aspirin as thromboprophylaxis for the Tissuemed porcine aortic bioprosthesis: a survey of five years' experience.
Goldsmith I; Lip GY; Mukundan S; Rosin MD
J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Sep; 7(5):574-9. PubMed ID: 9793859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prosthetic valve endocarditis. Comparison of heterograft tissue valves and mechanical valves.
Rossiter SJ; Stinson EB; Oyer PE; Miller DC; Schapira JN; Martin RP; Shumway NE
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1978 Dec; 76(6):795-803. PubMed ID: 713586
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Follow-up results 5 years after aortic valve replacement with a Smeloff-Cutter prosthesis. Apropos of 200 cases].
Soyer R; Brunet A; Redonnet M; Hubscher C; Letac B
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1983 Apr; 76(4):391-9. PubMed ID: 6223609
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of patient-prosthesis mismatch on long-term results after aortic valve replacement with a stented bioprosthesis.
Frapier JM; Rouvière P; Razcka F; Aymard T; Albat B; Chaptal PA
J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Jul; 11(4):543-51. PubMed ID: 12150304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Late follow-up of the flexible stent, low profile Liotta bioprosthesis.
Navia JA; Belzzitti J; Meletti J; Liotta D
Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():254-7. PubMed ID: 3727697
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Late results of heart valve replacement with the Hancock II bioprosthesis.
David TE; Ivanov J; Armstrong S; Feindel CM; Cohen G
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Feb; 121(2):268-77. PubMed ID: 11174732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Eighteen-year follow up after Hancock II bioprosthesis insertion.
Legarra JJ; Llorens R; Catalan M; Segura I; Trenor AM; de Buruaga JS; Rabago G; Sarralde A
J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 10096477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Five- to eight-year follow-up of patients with the Hancock cardiac bioprosthesis.
Gallo I; Ruiz B; Duran CM
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1983 Dec; 86(6):897-902. PubMed ID: 6645592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Simultaneous aortic and mitral valve replacement: predictors of adverse outcome.
Kuwaki K; Tsukamoto M; Komatsu K; Morishita K; Sakata J; Abe T
J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 Mar; 12(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 12701788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Medtronic Intact porcine bioprosthesis: clinical performance to eight years.
Munro AI; Jamieson WR; Tyers GF; Burr LH
J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 Nov; 3(6):634-40. PubMed ID: 8000606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Valvular substitution using a dura mater bioprosthesis. Interim results].
Morillo F; Senador G; Paravisini J
Rev Esp Cardiol; 1982; 35(4):347-50. PubMed ID: 7178620
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Valve reoperations. Apropos of 49 patients undergoing reoperation in a series of 1390 patients with 1 or more valve prostheses].
Vanetti A; Pernet P; Gaillard D; Robinault J; Rolland JM
Ann Chir; 1985 Oct; 39(7):443-7. PubMed ID: 4083754
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Aortic and mitral valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: 10-year results.
Murakami T; Eishi K; Nakano S; Kobayashi J; Sasako Y; Isobe F; Kosakai Y; Kito Y; Kawashima Y
J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Jan; 5(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 8834725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The Carpentier-Edwards porcine valve in the supra annular aortic position. Results after 12 years in a series of 1108 patients].
Logeais Y; Leguerrier A; Rioux C; Chaperon J; Lelong B; Langanay T; Delambre JF; el Issa A; Valla J
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1997 Jun; 90(6):779-88. PubMed ID: 9295930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of bioprostheses and mechanical prostheses assessed by composites of valve-related complications to 15 years after aortic valve replacement.
Chan V; Jamieson WR; Germann E; Chan F; Miyagishima RT; Burr LH; Janusz MT; Ling H; Fradet GJ
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Jun; 131(6):1267-73. PubMed ID: 16733156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Aortic valve replacement: a prospective randomized evaluation of mechanical versus biological valves in patients ages 55 to 70 years.
Stassano P; Di Tommaso L; Monaco M; Iorio F; Pepino P; Spampinato N; Vosa C
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 Nov; 54(20):1862-8. PubMed ID: 19892237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Early and late risk of aortic valve replacement. A 12 year concomitant comparison of the porcine bioprosthetic and tilting disc prosthetic aortic valves.
Cohn LH; Allred EN; DiSesa VJ; Sawtelle K; Shemin RJ; Collins JJ
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1984 Nov; 88(5 Pt 1):695-705. PubMed ID: 6492838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Endocarditis following valve replacement with bioprostheses.
Huth C; Seybold-Epting W; Seboldt H; Fenchel G; Hoffmeister HE
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1982 Dec; 30(6):365-7. PubMed ID: 6187095
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
