These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6463450)

  • 1. Bias in methods for deriving standardized morbidity ratio and attributable fraction estimates.
    Greenland S
    Stat Med; 1984; 3(2):131-41. PubMed ID: 6463450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Variance estimators for attributable fraction estimates consistent in both large strata and sparse data.
    Greenland S
    Stat Med; 1987 Sep; 6(6):701-8. PubMed ID: 2825320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attributable risk estimation from matched case-control data.
    Kuritz SJ; Landis JR
    Biometrics; 1988 Jun; 44(2):355-67. PubMed ID: 3390504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multiple imputation methods for the missing covariates in generalized estimating equation.
    Xie F; Paik MC
    Biometrics; 1997 Dec; 53(4):1538-46. PubMed ID: 9423268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A note on the bias of estimators with missing data.
    Rotnitzky A; Wypij D
    Biometrics; 1994 Dec; 50(4):1163-70. PubMed ID: 7786998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bias in indirectly adjusted comparisons due to taking the total study population as the reference group.
    Greenland S
    Stat Med; 1987 Mar; 6(2):193-5. PubMed ID: 3589248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bias in slope estimates for the linear errors in variables model by the variance ratio method.
    Edland SD
    Biometrics; 1996 Mar; 52(1):243-8. PubMed ID: 8934594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inverse probability weighting estimation of the volume under the ROC surface in the presence of verification bias.
    Zhang Y; Alonzo TA;
    Biom J; 2016 Nov; 58(6):1338-1356. PubMed ID: 27338713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Maximum likelihood estimation of the attributable fraction from logistic models.
    Greenland S; Drescher K
    Biometrics; 1993 Sep; 49(3):865-72. PubMed ID: 8241375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Homogeneity/heterogeneity hypotheses for standardized mortality ratios based on minimum power-divergence estimators.
    Pardo L; Martín N
    Biom J; 2009 Oct; 51(5):819-36. PubMed ID: 19827057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Generalized estimating equation model for binary outcomes with missing covariates.
    Xie F; Paik MC
    Biometrics; 1997 Dec; 53(4):1458-66. PubMed ID: 9423260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of non-differential exposure misclassification on estimates of the attributable and prevented fraction.
    Hsieh CC; Walter SD
    Stat Med; 1988 Oct; 7(10):1073-85. PubMed ID: 3206003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing performance between log-binomial and robust Poisson regression models for estimating risk ratios under model misspecification.
    Chen W; Qian L; Shi J; Franklin M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Jun; 18(1):63. PubMed ID: 29929477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Properties of alternative estimators of familial correlations under variable sibship size.
    Vogler GP; Wette R; McGue MK; Rao DC
    Biometrics; 1995 Mar; 51(1):276-83. PubMed ID: 7766782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using hidden Markov models to deal with availability bias on line transect surveys.
    Borchers DL; Zucchini W; Heide-Jørgensen MP; Cañadas A; Langrock R
    Biometrics; 2013 Sep; 69(3):703-13. PubMed ID: 23848543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of two bias-corrected covariance estimators for generalized estimating equations.
    Lu B; Preisser JS; Qaqish BF; Suchindran C; Bangdiwala SI; Wolfson M
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):935-41. PubMed ID: 17825023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methods for estimating the parameters of a linear model for ordered categorical data.
    Lipsitz SR
    Biometrics; 1992 Mar; 48(1):271-81. PubMed ID: 1581487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Methodological issues in cohort studies: point estimators of the rate ratio.
    Howe GR
    Int J Epidemiol; 1986 Jun; 15(2):257-62. PubMed ID: 3721688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Information estimators for weighted observations.
    Hino H; Murata N
    Neural Netw; 2013 Oct; 46():260-75. PubMed ID: 23859828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimating standardized risk differences from odds ratios.
    Greenland S; Holland P
    Biometrics; 1991 Mar; 47(1):319-22. PubMed ID: 2049505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.