These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6463552)

  • 1. Derived acoustically evoked brainstem responses by means of narrow-band and notched-noise masking in normal-hearing subjects.
    Thümmler I; Tietze G
    Scand Audiol; 1984; 13(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 6463552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Frequency-specific auditory brainstem responses to clicks masked by notched noise.
    van Zanten GA; Brocaar MP
    Audiology; 1984; 23(3):253-64. PubMed ID: 6732630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High-pass and notch noise masking in suprathreshold brainstem response audiometry.
    Laukli E
    Scand Audiol; 1983; 12(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 6612212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Derived brain stem responses by means of pure-tone masking.
    Pantev C; Pantev M
    Scand Audiol; 1982; 11(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 7178798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Will contralateral white noise interfere with the monaurally click-evoked brainstem response?
    Rosenhamer H; Holmkvist C
    Scand Audiol; 1983; 12(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 6844866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Effect of stimulus rise time and high-pass masking on early auditory evoked potentials].
    Bunke D; von Specht H; Mühler R; Pethe J; Kevanishvili Z
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Apr; 77(4):185-90. PubMed ID: 9592750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory brain stem potentials evoked by clicks in notch-filtered masking noise: audiological relevance.
    Pratt H; Ben-Yitzhak E; Attias J
    Audiology; 1984; 23(4):380-7. PubMed ID: 6466201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Results of recording frequency-specific acoustically evoked potentials with masked stimuli].
    Schönweiler R; Tolloczko R; Ptok M
    HNO; 1995 Jun; 43(6):378-82. PubMed ID: 7642399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory brain stem potentials evoked by clicks in notch-filtered masking noise.
    Pratt H; Bleich N
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1982 Apr; 53(4):417-26. PubMed ID: 6175503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Frequency-specific auditory brainstem responses. Effective masking levels and relationship to behavioural thresholds in normal hearing adults.
    Purdy SC; Houghton JM; Keith WJ; Greville KA
    Audiology; 1989; 28(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 2930366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reconstruction of the audiogram using brain stem responses and high-pass noise masking.
    Don M; Eggermont JJ; Brackmann DE
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1979; (3 Pt 2 Suppl 57):1-20. PubMed ID: 110210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Frequency specificity of chirp-evoked auditory brainstem responses.
    Wegner O; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Mar; 111(3):1318-29. PubMed ID: 11931309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditory brain stem responses from human adults and infants: restriction of frequency contribution by notched-noise masking.
    Folsom RC; Wynne MK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Oct; 80(4):1057-64. PubMed ID: 3771926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory brain stem responses from human infants: pure-tone masking profiles for clicks and filtered clicks.
    Folsom RC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Aug; 78(2):555-62. PubMed ID: 4031254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory brainstem response latency in forward masking, a marker of sensory deficits in listeners with normal hearing thresholds.
    Mehraei G; Gallardo AP; Shinn-Cunningham BG; Dau T
    Hear Res; 2017 Mar; 346():34-44. PubMed ID: 28159652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The frequency specificity of tone-pip evoked auditory brain stem responses.
    Kileny P
    Ear Hear; 1981; 2(6):270-5. PubMed ID: 7308602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Technical aspects of brainstem evoked potential audiometry using tones.
    Stapells DR; Picton TW
    Ear Hear; 1981; 2(1):20-9. PubMed ID: 7239023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Survey of attempts to use auditory evoked potentials to obtain an audiogram. Review article.
    Sohmer H; Kinarti R
    Br J Audiol; 1984 Nov; 18(4):237-44. PubMed ID: 6395931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of high-pass filtering on the detection of the auditory brainstem response.
    Mason SM
    Br J Audiol; 1984 Aug; 18(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 6487849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of broadband noise on the human brainstem auditory evoked response. II. Frequency specificity.
    Burkard R; Hecox K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Oct; 74(4):1214-23. PubMed ID: 6643844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.