These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6464793)

  • 41. A look at court appointed psychiatric evaluations in Israel with special reference to criminal liability.
    Durst R; Jabotinsky-Rubin K; Ginath Y
    Med Law; 1993; 12(1-2):153-63. PubMed ID: 8377609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Sexual assault, irresistible impulses, and forensic psychiatry in Sweden.
    Bergenheim A
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2014; 37(1):99-108. PubMed ID: 24315847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Forensic psychiatry and the birth of the criminal insane asylum in modern Italy.
    Gibson M
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2014; 37(1):117-26. PubMed ID: 24210450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Psychiatric testimony and the "reasonable person" standard.
    Weiss KJ
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999; 27(4):580-9. PubMed ID: 10638785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The impact of misdemeanor arrests on forensic mental health services: A state-wide review of Virginia sanity evaluations.
    Gardner BO; Murrie DC; Torres AN
    Law Hum Behav; 2020 Aug; 44(4):286-299. PubMed ID: 32757609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. What Makes Forensic Psychiatric Experts Change Their Opinion in Supplemental Evaluations?
    Periša A; Arbanas G
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2023 Jan; 67(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 35435024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. When insanity has gone undiscovered by the courts: The practice of the Norwegian Criminal Cases Review Commission in cases of doubts about insanity.
    Grøndahl P; Stridbeck U
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2016 Jul; 26(3):212-24. PubMed ID: 26032297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The use and reliability of psychiatric diagnosis in forensic settings.
    Reid WH; Wise M; Sutton B
    Psychiatr Clin North Am; 1992 Sep; 15(3):529-37. PubMed ID: 1409018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Some problems in forensic assessment].
    Schlegel J; Amboss M
    Psychiatr Neurol Med Psychol (Leipz); 1988 Nov; 40(11):641-6. PubMed ID: 3237869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Criminal responsibility evaluations: Benchmarking in different countries.
    Pouls C; Jeandarme I; Al-Taiar H; Bradford J; Canton W; Kristiansson M; Thibaut F; Verreyt V; Konrad N
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2022; 81():101775. PubMed ID: 35066422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Reports of medical experts in cases of drug addiction and assessment of mitigating circumstances by the court.
    Argente M; Pérez-Cárceles MD; Sánchez-Lucerga JF; Luna A; Osuna E
    Med Law; 2002; 21(4):793-801. PubMed ID: 15796006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Homicide and major mental disorder: what are the social, clinical, and forensic differences between murderers with a major mental disorder and murderers without any mental disorder?].
    Richard-Devantoy S; Chocard AS; Bourdel MC; Gohier B; Duflot JP; Lhuillier JP; Garré JB
    Encephale; 2009 Sep; 35(4):304-14. PubMed ID: 19748366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The insanity defense: a South African perspective.
    Nair MG; Wessels WH
    Med Law; 1992; 11(3-4):297-302. PubMed ID: 1453899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Present misuses of article 64 of the Criminal Code on insanity when performing the deed].
    Bénézech M
    Ann Med Psychol (Paris); 1989 Sep; 147(7):738-41. PubMed ID: 2619143
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. When killing isn't murder: psychiatric and psychological defences to murder when the insanity defence is not applicable.
    Samuels A; O'Driscoll C; Allnutt S
    Australas Psychiatry; 2007 Dec; 15(6):474-9. PubMed ID: 17999258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Methodologic considerations of the competence of psychiatric and psychological experts for criminal cases (with regard to Penal Code I and II)].
    Haddenbrock S
    Beitr Gerichtl Med; 1972; 29():17-25. PubMed ID: 5081971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Identifying factors associated with criminal responsibility by analyzing court trial verdicts.
    Shiina A; Sato A; Iyo M; Igarashi Y
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2021; 77():101702. PubMed ID: 33962349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Characteristics of murder and attempted murder in Cameroon. Study based on expert psychiatric court reports].
    Mbassa Menick D
    Med Trop (Mars); 2009 Jun; 69(3):255-62. PubMed ID: 19702147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Psychiatric comorbidity in forensic psychiatry.
    Palijan TZ; Muzinić L; Radeljak S
    Psychiatr Danub; 2009 Sep; 21(3):429-36. PubMed ID: 19794370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Neuroscience-based Psychiatric Assessments of Criminal Responsibility: Beyond Self-Report?
    Meynen G
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2020 Jul; 29(3):446-458. PubMed ID: 32484135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.