These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 646694)

  • 21. Comparison of the human and canine Schiotz tonometry conversion tables in clinically normal cats.
    Miller PE; Pickett JP
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1992 Oct; 201(7):1017-20. PubMed ID: 1429124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Portable tonometers: a clinical comparison of applanation and indentation devices.
    Chiara GF; Semes LP; Potter JW; Cutter GR; Tucker WR
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1989 Feb; 60(2):105-10. PubMed ID: 2703651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of the human and canine Schiotz tonometry conversion tables in clinically normal dogs.
    Miller PE; Pickett JP
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1992 Oct; 201(7):1021-5. PubMed ID: 1429125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Intraocular pressure measurement in children].
    Bresson-Dumont H
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2009 Mar; 32(3):176-81. PubMed ID: 19515328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Differential Intraocular Pressure Measurements by Tonometry and Direct Cannulation After Treatment with Soluble Adenylyl Cyclase Inhibitors.
    Gandhi JK; Roy Chowdhury U; Manzar Z; Buck J; Levin LR; Fautsch MP; Marmorstein AD
    J Ocul Pharmacol Ther; 2017 Oct; 33(8):574-581. PubMed ID: 28686538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [The relationship between central corneal thickness and Perkins applanation tonometry in rabbits].
    Luan CS; Chen XM; Deng YP; Wang L; Liu DJ; Cui M; Li J
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Jul; 41(7):642-6. PubMed ID: 16080901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of a rebound tonometer with an applanation tonometer in dogs with glaucoma.
    Slack JM; Stiles J; Moore GE
    Vet Rec; 2012 Oct; 171(15):373. PubMed ID: 22915681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Difference in intraocular pressure measurements between non-contact tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry and the role of central corneal thickness in affecting glaucoma referrals.
    Kamel K; Dervan E; Falzon K; O'Brien C
    Ir J Med Sci; 2019 Feb; 188(1):321-325. PubMed ID: 29616408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Measurement of intraocular pressure after epikeratophakia.
    Olson PF; McDonald MB; Werblin TP; Kaufman HE
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1983 Jul; 101(7):1111-2. PubMed ID: 6347151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Kaufmann C; Bachmann LM; Thiel MA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Sep; 45(9):3118-21. PubMed ID: 15326129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Icare rebound tonometry in children with known and suspected glaucoma.
    Flemmons MS; Hsiao YC; Dzau J; Asrani S; Jones S; Freedman SF
    J AAPOS; 2011 Apr; 15(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 21419676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Normal intraocular pressure in Egyptian children and meta-analysis.
    Moussa IR; Kassem RR; Edris NA; Khalil DH
    Eye (Lond); 2022 Jun; 36(6):1266-1273. PubMed ID: 34145417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Air pressure-induced iridocornea contact in a patient with primary angle closure observed with a dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer.
    Kawashima R; Matsushita K; Fujimoto H; Maeda N; Nishida K
    J Glaucoma; 2015; 24(5):e137-8. PubMed ID: 25836655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of corneal parameters in keratoconus on IOP readings obtained with different tonometers.
    Firat PG; Orman G; Doganay S; Demirel S
    Clin Exp Optom; 2013 Mar; 96(2):233-7. PubMed ID: 23320621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure differences between an air-puff tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer.
    Tranchina L; Lombardo M; Oddone F; Serrao S; Schiano Lomoriello D; Ducoli P
    J Glaucoma; 2013; 22(5):416-21. PubMed ID: 22366703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Measurement of the intraocular pressure with the "transpalpebral tonometer" TGDc-01 in comparison with applanation tonometry.
    Sandner D; Böhm A; Kostov S; Pillunat L
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2005 Jun; 243(6):563-9. PubMed ID: 15614540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Measuring Intraocular Pressure in Patients With Keratoconus With and Without Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments.
    Mendez-Hernandez C; Arribas-Pardo P; Cuiña-Sardiña R; Fernandez-Perez C; Mendez-Fernandez R; Saenz-Frances F; Benitez-Del-Castillo JM; Garcia-Feijoo J
    J Glaucoma; 2017 Jan; 26(1):71-76. PubMed ID: 27661992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessment of true intraocular pressure: the gap between theory and practical data.
    Chihara E
    Surv Ophthalmol; 2008; 53(3):203-18. PubMed ID: 18501267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of Rebound Tonometry, Perkins Applanation Tonometry and Ocular Response Analyser in Mucopolysaccharidosis Patients.
    Wasielica-Poslednik J; Butsch C; Lampe C; Elflein H; Lamparter J; Weyer V; Pitz S
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0133586. PubMed ID: 26317991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Tonometry after Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments for Keratoconus.
    Arribas-Pardo P; Mendez-Hernandez C; Cuiña-Sardiña R; Benitez-Del-Castillo JM; Garcia-Feijoo J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Oct; 94(10):986-992. PubMed ID: 28858044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.