These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 646694)

  • 41. Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Obtained by Rebound, Noncontact, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Children.
    Feng CS; Jin KW; Yi K; Choi DG
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 Nov; 160(5):937-943.e1. PubMed ID: 26210864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The relationship between measurement method and corneal structure on apparent intraocular pressure in glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
    Nessim M; Mollan SP; Wolffsohn JS; Laiquzzaman M; Sivakumar S; Hartley S; Shah S
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2013 Apr; 36(2):57-61. PubMed ID: 23253796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effect of corneal thickness on dynamic contour, rebound, and goldmann tonometry.
    Martinez-de-la-Casa JM; Garcia-Feijoo J; Vico E; Fernandez-Vidal A; Benitez del Castillo JM; Wasfi M; Garcia-Sanchez J
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Dec; 113(12):2156-62. PubMed ID: 16996599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Inter-instrument agreement and influence of central corneal thickness on measurements with Goldmann, pneumotonometer and noncontact tonometer in glaucomatous eyes.
    Gupta V; Sony P; Agarwal HC; Sihota R; Sharma A
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2006 Dec; 54(4):261-5. PubMed ID: 17090879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Relationship of central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure by iCare rebound tonometer.
    Rao A; Kumar M; Prakash B; Varshney G
    J Glaucoma; 2014 Aug; 23(6):380-4. PubMed ID: 23221904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Tonographic Effect of Ocular Response Analyzer in Comparison to Goldmann Applanation Tonometry.
    Zimmermann M; Pitz S; Schmidtmann I; Pfeiffer N; Wasielica-Poslednik J
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169438. PubMed ID: 28068365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison of Perkins, Tono-Pen and Schiøtz tonometers in paediatric patients under general anaesthesia.
    Gharaei H; Kargozar A; Raygan F; Daneshvar R
    East Mediterr Health J; 2008; 14(6):1365-71. PubMed ID: 19161112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Rebound tonometer: ideal tonometer for measurement of accurate intraocular pressure.
    Suman S; Agrawal A; Pal VK; Pratap VB
    J Glaucoma; 2014 Dec; 23(9):633-7. PubMed ID: 23429611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A history of intraocular pressure and its measurement.
    Stamper RL
    Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Jan; 88(1):E16-28. PubMed ID: 21150677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Ocular tension in children measured with Mackay-Marg's tonometer].
    Sawada A; Koshiyama H; Takeda T
    Nihon Ganka Kiyo; 1969 Aug; 20(8):781-3. PubMed ID: 5391482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Rebound tonometry over an air-filled anterior chamber in the supine child after intraocular surgery.
    Davis R; Jiramongkolchai K; Silverstein E; Freedman SF
    J AAPOS; 2016 Apr; 20(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 27079599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Clinical comparison of pascal dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in asymmetric open-angle glaucoma.
    Sullivan-Mee M; Halverson KD; Qualls C
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Dec; 16(8):694-9. PubMed ID: 18091457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Reliability and reproducibility of introcular pressure (IOP) measurement with the Icare
    Valero B; Fénolland JR; Rosenberg R; Sendon D; Mesnard C; Sigaux M; Giraud JM; Renard JP
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2017 Dec; 40(10):865-875. PubMed ID: 29174296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Does corneal ocular "pseudo-hypertension" exist?].
    Velten IM; Budde WM; Jünemann A
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1999 Jul; 215(1):56-8. PubMed ID: 10448639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A new tonometer--the Corvis ST tonometer: clinical comparison with noncontact and Goldmann applanation tonometers.
    Hong J; Xu J; Wei A; Deng SX; Cui X; Yu X; Sun X
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Jan; 54(1):659-65. PubMed ID: 23307970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Principle and results of a new "non-contact-tonometer" are discussed (author's transl)].
    Draeger J; Jessen K; Haselmann G
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1975 Jul; 167(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 1202268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers.
    Kotecha A; White E; Schlottmann PG; Garway-Heath DF
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):730-7. PubMed ID: 20122737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Corneal hysteresis but not corneal thickness correlates with optic nerve surface compliance in glaucoma patients.
    Wells AP; Garway-Heath DF; Poostchi A; Wong T; Chan KC; Sachdev N
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Aug; 49(8):3262-8. PubMed ID: 18316697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comparison of the ocular response analyzer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty.
    Feizi S; Hashemloo A; Rastegarpour A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Jul; 52(8):5887-91. PubMed ID: 21447674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Effect of central corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and axial length on applanation tonometry.
    Kohlhaas M; Boehm AG; Spoerl E; Pürsten A; Grein HJ; Pillunat LE
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2006 Apr; 124(4):471-6. PubMed ID: 16606871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.