These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 646731)

  • 1. Electrophysiological investigation of auditory recruitment by averaged electroencephalographic-evoked response.
    Uziel A; Seneclause S
    Audiology; 1978; 17(2):141-51. PubMed ID: 646731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrophysiologic correlates of intensity discrimination in cortical evoked potentials of younger and older adults.
    Harris KC; Mills JH; Dubno JR
    Hear Res; 2007 Jun; 228(1-2):58-68. PubMed ID: 17344001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evoked cerebral potential audiometry and hearing threshold.
    Prevec TS; Cernelc S; Ribaric K
    Audiology; 1976; 15(1):39-49. PubMed ID: 1252189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory processing of frequency ramps.
    Arlinger S
    Audiology; 1977; 16(6):480-6. PubMed ID: 921606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electrophysiological measures of auditory perception.
    Antonelli AR
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1976 Nov; 97 Suppl():613-21. PubMed ID: 1019446
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Early tone-evoked responses in normal and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Stillman RD; Moushegian G; Rupert AL
    Audiology; 1976; 15(1):10-22. PubMed ID: 1252187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using a combination of click- and tone burst-evoked auditory brain stem response measurements to estimate pure-tone thresholds.
    Gorga MP; Johnson TA; Kaminski JR; Beauchaine KL; Garner CA; Neely ST
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 16446565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of audiometric configuration on threshold and suprathreshold auditory steady-state responses.
    Vander Werff KR; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2005 Jun; 26(3):310-26. PubMed ID: 15937412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Middle components of the AER to tone-pips in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.
    McFarland WH; Vivion MC; Goldstein R
    J Speech Hear Res; 1977 Dec; 20(4):781-98. PubMed ID: 604690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users I: effects of stimulus current level and electrode site on the electrical ABR, MLR, and N1-P2 response.
    Firszt JB; Chambers RD; Kraus And N; Reeder RM
    Ear Hear; 2002 Dec; 23(6):502-15. PubMed ID: 12476088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory cortical responses in patients with cochlear implants.
    Burdo S; Razza S; Di Berardino F; Tognola G
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2006 Apr; 26(2):69-77. PubMed ID: 16886849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users.
    Kelly AS; Purdy SC; Thorne PR
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1235-46. PubMed ID: 15978485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intensity dependence of auditory-evoked cortical potentials in fibromyalgia patients: a test of the generalized hypervigilance hypothesis.
    Carrillo-de-la-Peña MT; Vallet M; Pérez MI; Gómez-Perretta C
    J Pain; 2006 Jul; 7(7):480-7. PubMed ID: 16814687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Simultaneously-evoked auditory potentials (SEAP): A new method for concurrent measurement of cortical and subcortical auditory-evoked activity.
    Slugocki C; Bosnyak D; Trainor LJ
    Hear Res; 2017 Mar; 345():30-42. PubMed ID: 28043881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Influence of the intensity of stimulation on evoked auditory potentials in normal subjects and in hypoacusia with recruitment].
    Marco J; Ruíz Carmona E
    Acta Otorinolaryngol Iber Am; 1972; 23(2):181-8 passim. PubMed ID: 5077020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A temporal component of the auditory evoked response.
    Wolpaw JR; Penry JK
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1975 Dec; 39(6):609-20. PubMed ID: 53139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bitemporal lesions dissociate auditory evoked potentials and perception.
    Woods DL; Knight RT; Neville HJ
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1984 Mar; 57(3):208-20. PubMed ID: 6199182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evidence for multiple mechanisms of cortical plasticity: a study of humans with late-onset profound unilateral deafness.
    Maslin MR; Munro KJ; El-Deredy W
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2013 Jul; 124(7):1414-21. PubMed ID: 23529154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cortical auditory evoked potentials in cochlear implant listeners via single electrode stimulation in relation to speech perception.
    Liebscher T; Alberter K; Hoppe U
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Dec; 57(12):933-940. PubMed ID: 30295156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidence of a tonotopic organization of the auditory cortex in cochlear implant users.
    Guiraud J; Besle J; Arnold L; Boyle P; Giard MH; Bertrand O; Norena A; Truy E; Collet L
    J Neurosci; 2007 Jul; 27(29):7838-46. PubMed ID: 17634377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.