88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6467937)
1. Deciding for the incompetent patient: the role of family members.
Healey JM
Conn Med; 1984 Jul; 48(7):477. PubMed ID: 6467937
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Right-to-die issues in Minnesota.
Klein JE
Minn Med; 1991 Apr; 74(4):33-6. PubMed ID: 1875875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Termination of life support systems in the elderly. Discussion: To die before the gods please: legal issues surrounding euthanasia and the elderly.
Baron CH
J Geriatr Psychiatry; 1981; 14(1):45-70. PubMed ID: 7343584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Deciding for the incompetent patient: identifying the role of family members.
Healey JM
Conn Med; 1984 Oct; 48(10):687. PubMed ID: 11644167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Job in court.
Capron AM
Hastings Cent Rep; 1999; 29(5):22-5. PubMed ID: 10587807
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of judges in life/death decisions for the neurologically impaired.
Beresford HR
Ann Neurol; 1978 Nov; 4(5):463-4. PubMed ID: 736527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Decision making in the care of terminally ill incompetent persons: concerns about the role of the courts.
Mariner WK
J Am Geriatr Soc; 1984 Oct; 32(10):739-46. PubMed ID: 6481053
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Courts, committees, and caring.
Veatch RM
Am Med News; 1980 May; 23(20):suppl 1-2, 11-3. PubMed ID: 10246552
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Dynamic complementarity: Terri's law and separation of powers principles in the end-of-life context.
Snead OC
Fla Law Rev; 2005 Jan; 57(1):53-89. PubMed ID: 17153246
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cancer nursing and the law. Discontinuance of life-prolonging measures for patients who are not competent to consent: the case of Benjamin C. Part I.
Gargaro WJ
Cancer Nurs; 1979 Oct; 2(5):387-8. PubMed ID: 261043
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Cancer nursing and the law. Discontinuance of life-prolonging measures for patients who are not competent to consent. The case of Benjamin C. Part II.
Gargaro WJ
Cancer Nurs; 1979 Dec; 2(6):489-90. PubMed ID: 259445
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Someone to watch over me: medical decision-making for hopelessly ill incompetent adult patients.
Dippel DL
Akron Law Rev; 1991; 24(3-4):639-80. PubMed ID: 16144098
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Saikewicz precedent: what's good for an incompetent patient?
Ramsey P
Hastings Cent Rep; 1978 Dec; 8(6):36-42. PubMed ID: 152738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Authenticity, autonomy, and mental disorders.
Ganzini L; Lee MA
J Clin Ethics; 1993; 4(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 8490222
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Treatment of incompetent terminally ill patients. 1. The American experience.
Thomson CJ
Med J Aust; 1982 Feb; 1(4):188-90. PubMed ID: 7078492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Judicial approach beginning to develop for terminating life support systems. Part 1.
Weissburg C; Hartz JN
Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1979 Aug; 12(4):44-8. PubMed ID: 10242941
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Surrogate decisions in New York State on sustaining life.
Rouse F
Mt Sinai J Med; 1991 Oct; 58(5):379-81; discussion 398-402. PubMed ID: 1753970
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. In the matter of the guardianship of Joseph Hamlin, an incompetent person.
Paulus SM
Issues Law Med; 1985 Sep; 1(2):167-70. PubMed ID: 3850087
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Post-Saikewicz judicial actions clarify the rights of patients and families.
Glantz LH
Medicoleg News; 1978; 6(4):9-11. PubMed ID: 10240215
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Refusing medical treatment: incompetent adults.
Barnes G
Dimens Health Serv; 1983 Apr; 60(4):26-7, 29-30. PubMed ID: 6852401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
