These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6467937)
1. Deciding for the incompetent patient: the role of family members. Healey JM Conn Med; 1984 Jul; 48(7):477. PubMed ID: 6467937 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Right-to-die issues in Minnesota. Klein JE Minn Med; 1991 Apr; 74(4):33-6. PubMed ID: 1875875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Termination of life support systems in the elderly. Discussion: To die before the gods please: legal issues surrounding euthanasia and the elderly. Baron CH J Geriatr Psychiatry; 1981; 14(1):45-70. PubMed ID: 7343584 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Deciding for the incompetent patient: identifying the role of family members. Healey JM Conn Med; 1984 Oct; 48(10):687. PubMed ID: 11644167 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Job in court. Capron AM Hastings Cent Rep; 1999; 29(5):22-5. PubMed ID: 10587807 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of judges in life/death decisions for the neurologically impaired. Beresford HR Ann Neurol; 1978 Nov; 4(5):463-4. PubMed ID: 736527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Decision making in the care of terminally ill incompetent persons: concerns about the role of the courts. Mariner WK J Am Geriatr Soc; 1984 Oct; 32(10):739-46. PubMed ID: 6481053 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Courts, committees, and caring. Veatch RM Am Med News; 1980 May; 23(20):suppl 1-2, 11-3. PubMed ID: 10246552 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Dynamic complementarity: Terri's law and separation of powers principles in the end-of-life context. Snead OC Fla Law Rev; 2005 Jan; 57(1):53-89. PubMed ID: 17153246 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cancer nursing and the law. Discontinuance of life-prolonging measures for patients who are not competent to consent: the case of Benjamin C. Part I. Gargaro WJ Cancer Nurs; 1979 Oct; 2(5):387-8. PubMed ID: 261043 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Cancer nursing and the law. Discontinuance of life-prolonging measures for patients who are not competent to consent. The case of Benjamin C. Part II. Gargaro WJ Cancer Nurs; 1979 Dec; 2(6):489-90. PubMed ID: 259445 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Someone to watch over me: medical decision-making for hopelessly ill incompetent adult patients. Dippel DL Akron Law Rev; 1991; 24(3-4):639-80. PubMed ID: 16144098 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Saikewicz precedent: what's good for an incompetent patient? Ramsey P Hastings Cent Rep; 1978 Dec; 8(6):36-42. PubMed ID: 152738 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Authenticity, autonomy, and mental disorders. Ganzini L; Lee MA J Clin Ethics; 1993; 4(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 8490222 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Treatment of incompetent terminally ill patients. 1. The American experience. Thomson CJ Med J Aust; 1982 Feb; 1(4):188-90. PubMed ID: 7078492 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Judicial approach beginning to develop for terminating life support systems. Part 1. Weissburg C; Hartz JN Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1979 Aug; 12(4):44-8. PubMed ID: 10242941 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Surrogate decisions in New York State on sustaining life. Rouse F Mt Sinai J Med; 1991 Oct; 58(5):379-81; discussion 398-402. PubMed ID: 1753970 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. In the matter of the guardianship of Joseph Hamlin, an incompetent person. Paulus SM Issues Law Med; 1985 Sep; 1(2):167-70. PubMed ID: 3850087 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Post-Saikewicz judicial actions clarify the rights of patients and families. Glantz LH Medicoleg News; 1978; 6(4):9-11. PubMed ID: 10240215 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Refusing medical treatment: incompetent adults. Barnes G Dimens Health Serv; 1983 Apr; 60(4):26-7, 29-30. PubMed ID: 6852401 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]