These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Family law--guardians of incompetent persons can refuse life-prolonging treatment for their wards. Gilman GS Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1978; 12(4):1039-57. PubMed ID: 11662777 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Quality of life and non-treatment decisions for incompetent patients: a critique of the orthodox approach. Dresser RS; Robertson JA Law Med Health Care; 1989; 17(3):234-44. PubMed ID: 2811462 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Incompetent's right to die: who decides? Bernstein AH Hospitals; 1979 Sep; 53(17):39, 42. PubMed ID: 457072 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Refusing treatment for incompetent patients; why Quinlan and Saikewicz cases agree on roles of guardians, physicians, judges, and ethics committees. Annas GJ N Y State J Med; 1980 Apr; 80(5):816-21. PubMed ID: 6930563 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. For them rather than by them. Capron AM Hastings Cent Rep; 1993; 23(6):30-1. PubMed ID: 8307744 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The Quinlan case: death decision by committee. Annas GJ New Physician; 1979 Feb; 28(2):53-4, 56. PubMed ID: 10240660 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Equality for the elderly incompetent: a proposal for dignified death. Merritt TL Stanford Law Rev; 1987 Feb; 39(3):689-736. PubMed ID: 10281165 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Withholding nutrition and mistrusting nurturance: the vocabulary of In re Conroy. Burt RA Issues Law Med; 1987 Jan; 2(4):317-30. PubMed ID: 3104232 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. John F. Kennedy Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Bludworth. Paulus SM Issues Law Med; 1985 Sep; 1(2):163-6. PubMed ID: 11643875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. A moral dilemma: the role of judicial intervention in withholding or withdrawing nutrition and hydration. Peccarelli AM John Marshall Law Rev; 1990; 23(4):537-68. PubMed ID: 16622961 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Medical futility: when is enough, enough? Cultice PN J Health Hosp Law; 1994 Aug; 27(8):225-32, 256. PubMed ID: 10171943 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. When love and abuse are not mutually exclusive: the need for government intervention. Obernberger S Issues Law Med; 1997; 12(4):355-81. PubMed ID: 9114605 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Relatives sue for putting patient on life-support. Creighton H Nurs Manage; 1985 Nov; 16(11):56-60. PubMed ID: 3851235 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Law for leaders. "No Code" orders: current developments and the nursing director's role. Cushing M J Nurs Adm; 1981 Apr; 11(4):22-9. PubMed ID: 6914375 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Death with dignity: is judicial involvement necessary? Bernstein AH Hospitals; 1982 May; 56(9):93-5. PubMed ID: 7061091 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Do not resuscitate: the failure to protect the incompetent patient's right of self-determination. Shaver E Cornell Law Rev; 1989 Nov; 75(1):218-45. PubMed ID: 10296951 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The discontinuation of "extraordinary" medical treatment from a terminal patient: a physician's civil liability in New York. Giancola PJ Med Trial Tech Q; 1980; 26(3):326-54. PubMed ID: 6155590 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. A response to Irwin Kramer's reply. Peccarelli AM John Marshall Law Rev; 1990; 23(4):585-9. PubMed ID: 16622963 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]