These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6469182)
1. [Death of a patient following invasive diagnosis. To what extent must the examining physician include new, as yet unproved procedures in his diagnosis?]. Fortschr Med; 1984 Jun; 102(24):70-1. PubMed ID: 6469182 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Legal problems in neurological diagnosis]. Ritter G Nervenarzt; 1975 Apr; 46(4):169-72. PubMed ID: 1178087 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Written consent pror to medical treatment?]. Weissauer W Chirurg; 1972 Jun; 43(6):Suppl 6:37-44. PubMed ID: 5047773 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Need to inform the patient and required supervision regarding novice physicians performing surgical interventions]. Uhlenbruck W Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1981 Nov; 106(48):1630-2. PubMed ID: 7308004 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Informed consent in Washington: expanded scope of material facts that the physician must disclose to his patient. Rauzi E Wash Law Rev; 1980 Jun; 55(3):655-75. PubMed ID: 11665260 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Recent jurisprudential applications of the obligation of the physician to inform the patient and obtain his clear consent]. Doll PJ Med Leg Dommage Corpor; 1973; 6(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 4800647 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Close to the edge of the pubic hair! Patient education and clinical skill responsibility in plastic surgery are legally evaluated differently]. Fortschr Med; 1988 Jan; 106(3):80-1. PubMed ID: 2965090 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Informed consent: a new standard for Texas. Dalrymple G St Marys Law J; 1976; 8(3):499-513. PubMed ID: 11664790 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [The physician in the malpractice suit. (2) How does the patient have to be informed?]. Weissauer W MMW Munch Med Wochenschr; 1980 Feb; 122(6):49-50. PubMed ID: 6767962 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Refusal of information from a legal and medical viewpoint]. Minnigerode B HNO; 1983 Jul; 31(7):244-6. PubMed ID: 6885529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The patient-physician relationship: present law and trends for the future implied in Cobbs v. Grant. Kenna TW Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1973; 8(2):320-42. PubMed ID: 11664406 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Prescriptions of drugs to minors]. Uhlenbruck W Med Klin; 1972 Feb; 67(8):270-2. PubMed ID: 5031373 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Compulsory information of the patient on his health status]. Kohlhaas M Med Welt; 1968 Oct; 43():2381-5. PubMed ID: 5712753 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Confidences of malpractice plaintiffs: should their secrets be revealed? Turner JW South Tex Law Rev; 1987; 28(1):71-95. PubMed ID: 11650782 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Informed consent: looking for the action. Riskin LL Univ Ill Law Forum; 1975; 1975(4):580-611. PubMed ID: 11664566 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Physicians and surgeons--malpractice--informed consent of patient: duty to inform patient to be established by expert medical testimony. Wash Law Rev; 1973 May; 48(3):697-710. PubMed ID: 11664248 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Surgery without consent?]. Arndts F Lebensversicher Med; 1970 Sep; 22(5):117-8. PubMed ID: 4396374 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [When should contraceptive agents be given to minors?]. Schewe G MMW Munch Med Wochenschr; 1980 Jun; 122(25):923-4. PubMed ID: 6772938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]