190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6472401)
1. Determinants of the increasing cesarean birth rate. Ontario data 1979 to 1982.
Anderson GM; Lomas J
N Engl J Med; 1984 Oct; 311(14):887-92. PubMed ID: 6472401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Caesarean birth rates worldwide. A search for determinants.
van Roosmalen J; van der Does CD
Trop Geogr Med; 1995; 47(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 7747325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Trends in the frequency of cesarean delivery. A 21-year experience, 1970-1990.
Eskew PN; Saywell RM; Zollinger TW; Erner BK; Oser TL
J Reprod Med; 1994 Oct; 39(10):809-17. PubMed ID: 7837129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Jordanian cesarean section rate.
Hindawi IM; Meri ZB
Saudi Med J; 2004 Nov; 25(11):1631-5. PubMed ID: 15573191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cesarean sections in Alberta from April 1979 to March 1988.
Saunders LD; Flowerdew G
CMAJ; 1991 May; 144(10):1243-9, 1252. PubMed ID: 2025819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cesarean section: analysis of the experience before and after the National Consensus Conference on Aspects of Cesarean Birth.
Soliman SR; Burrows RF
CMAJ; 1993 Apr; 148(8):1315-20. PubMed ID: 8462053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Explaining variations in cesarean section rates: patients, facilities or policies?
Anderson GM; Lomas J
Can Med Assoc J; 1985 Feb; 132(3):253-6, 259. PubMed ID: 3967160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Recent trends in cesarean section rates in Ontario.
Anderson GM; Lomas J
CMAJ; 1989 Nov; 141(10):1049-53. PubMed ID: 2804827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cesarean section in the primigravid.
Mesleh RA; Asiri F; Al-Naim MF
Saudi Med J; 2000 Oct; 21(10):957-9. PubMed ID: 11369962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The cesarean delivery rate can be safely reduced in a developing country.
de Muylder X; Thiery M
Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Mar; 75(3 Pt 1):360-4. PubMed ID: 2304708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cesarean section: changing incidence and indications.
Gilstrap LC; Hauth JC; Toussaint S
Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Feb; 63(2):205-8. PubMed ID: 6694814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Indications for cesarean section].
Stoll W
Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1990 Feb; 120(8):255-9. PubMed ID: 2408143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reasons for the rising cesarean delivery rates: 1978-1984.
Shiono PH; McNellis D; Rhoads GG
Obstet Gynecol; 1987 May; 69(5):696-700. PubMed ID: 3574796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of fetal monitoring on the incidence of cesarean section.
Hughey MJ; LaPata RE; McElin TW; Lussky R
Obstet Gynecol; 1977 May; 49(5):513-8. PubMed ID: 850561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Meeting the challenge of the rising cesarean birth rate.
Porreco RP
Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Jan; 75(1):133-6. PubMed ID: 2296410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The rising cesarean section rate: can it safely be reversed?
Minkoff HL; Schwarz RH
Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Aug; 56(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 7393501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relation of private or clinic care to the cesarean birth rate.
de Regt RH; Minkoff HL; Feldman J; Schwarz RH
N Engl J Med; 1986 Sep; 315(10):619-24. PubMed ID: 3736601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Epidemiological surveillance and obstetrical dystocias surgery in Senegal].
Bouillin D; Fournier G; Gueye A; Diadhiou F; Cissé CT
Sante; 1994; 4(6):399-406. PubMed ID: 7850191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risks preceding increased primary cesarean birth rates.
Sokol RJ; Rosen MG; Bottoms SF; Chik L
Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Mar; 59(3):340-6. PubMed ID: 7078881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
