These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Identification of 3D shape from texture and motion across the visual field. Gurnsey R; Poirier FJ; Bluett P; Leibov L J Vis; 2006 Apr; 6(5):543-53. PubMed ID: 16881787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stimulus size scaling and foveal load as determinants of peripheral target detection. Chan HS; Courtney AJ Ergonomics; 1998 Oct; 41(10):1433-52. PubMed ID: 9802251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection and discrimination of curvature in foveal and peripheral vision. Whitaker D; Latham K; Mäkelä P; Rovamo J Vision Res; 1993 Nov; 33(16):2215-24. PubMed ID: 8273288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modelling of orientation discrimination across the visual field. Mäkelä P; Whitaker D; Rovamo J Vision Res; 1993; 33(5-6):723-30. PubMed ID: 8351844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Periodicity in orientation discrimination and the unconfounding of visual information. Regan D; Price P Vision Res; 1986; 26(8):1299-302. PubMed ID: 3798764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evidence of a global oblique effect in human extrafoveal vision. Pointer JS Perception; 1996; 25(5):523-30. PubMed ID: 8865295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Human orientation discrimination: changes with eccentricity in normal and amblyopic vision. Vandenbussche E; Vogels R; Orban GA Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1986 Feb; 27(2):237-45. PubMed ID: 3943947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Non-monotonic changes in performance with eccentricity modeled by multiple eccentricity-dependent limitations. Poirier FJ; Gurnsey R Vision Res; 2005 Aug; 45(18):2436-48. PubMed ID: 15979465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differences between fovea and periphery in the detection and discrimination of spatial offsets. Harris JP; Fahle M Vision Res; 1996 Nov; 36(21):3469-77. PubMed ID: 8977013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Raised visual detection thresholds depend on the level of complexity of cognitive foveal loading. Plainis S; Murray IJ; Chauhan K Perception; 2001; 30(10):1203-12. PubMed ID: 11721822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Attention effects on form discrimination at different eccentricities. Cheal ML; Lyon D Q J Exp Psychol A; 1989 Nov; 41(4):719-46. PubMed ID: 2587796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Motion-onset visual-evoked potentials as a function of retinal eccentricity in man. Schlykowa L; van Dijk BW; Ehrenstein WH Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 1993 Oct; 1(3):169-74. PubMed ID: 8257872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Hermann grid illusion: a tool for studying human perspective field organization. Spillmann L Perception; 1994; 23(6):691-708. PubMed ID: 7845762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Orientation dependency for foveal line stimuli: detection and intensity discrimination, resolution, orientation discrimination and vernier acuity. Westheimer G; Beard BL Vision Res; 1998 Apr; 38(8):1097-103. PubMed ID: 9666969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]