These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6473051)

  • 1. The effect of changes in visible area on facial recognition.
    Inui T; Miyamoto K
    Perception; 1984; 13(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 6473051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Matching familiar and unfamiliar faces on internal and external features.
    Young AW; Hay DC; McWeeny KH; Flude BM; Ellis AW
    Perception; 1985; 14(6):737-46. PubMed ID: 3837875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Face imagery is based on featural representations.
    Lobmaier JS; Mast FW
    Exp Psychol; 2008; 55(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 18271353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Matching faces and expressions in pixelated and blurred photos.
    White M; Li J
    Am J Psychol; 2006; 119(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 16550853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sensitivity to the displacement of facial features in negative and inverted images.
    Kemp R; McManus C; Pigott T
    Perception; 1990; 19(4):531-43. PubMed ID: 2096371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recognition of parts of famous-face photographs by children: an experimental note.
    Campbell R; Tuck M
    Perception; 1995; 24(4):451-6. PubMed ID: 7675623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Familiar and unfamiliar face recognition: a review.
    Johnston RA; Edmonds AJ
    Memory; 2009 Jul; 17(5):577-96. PubMed ID: 19548173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differences in the coding of spatial relations in face identification and basic-level object recognition.
    Cooper EE; Wojan TJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Mar; 26(2):470-88. PubMed ID: 10764107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Configurational information in face perception.
    Young AW; Hellawell D; Hay DC
    Perception; 1987; 16(6):747-59. PubMed ID: 3454432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Repetition priming from incomplete faces: evidence for part to whole completion.
    Brunas J; Young AW; Ellis AW
    Br J Psychol; 1990 Feb; 81 ( Pt 1)():43-56. PubMed ID: 2322764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatial frequencies in short-term memory for faces: a test of three frequency-dependent hypotheses.
    Wenger MJ; Townsend JT
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Jan; 28(1):125-42. PubMed ID: 10714144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Faces are "spatial"--holistic face perception is supported by low spatial frequencies.
    Goffaux V; Rossion B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):1023-39. PubMed ID: 16846295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recognising facial surfaces.
    Bruce V; Healey P; Burton M; Doyle T; Coombes A; Linney A
    Perception; 1991; 20(6):755-69. PubMed ID: 1816534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Face perception: an integrative review of the role of spatial frequencies.
    Ruiz-Soler M; Beltran FS
    Psychol Res; 2006 Jul; 70(4):273-92. PubMed ID: 16075260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Line drawings of faces reduce configural processing.
    Leder H
    Perception; 1996; 25(3):355-66. PubMed ID: 8804099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Information processing during face recognition: the effects of familiarity, inversion, and morphing on scanning fixations.
    Barton JJ; Radcliffe N; Cherkasova MV; Edelman J; Intriligator JM
    Perception; 2006; 35(8):1089-105. PubMed ID: 17076068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The importance of internal facial features in learning new faces.
    Longmore CA; Liu CH; Young AW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(2):249-60. PubMed ID: 25203612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatial content and spatial quantisation effects in face recognition.
    Costen NP; Parker DM; Craw I
    Perception; 1994; 23(2):129-46. PubMed ID: 7971093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatial frequency tuning of upright and inverted face identification.
    Gaspar C; Sekuler AB; Bennett PJ
    Vision Res; 2008 Dec; 48(28):2817-26. PubMed ID: 18835403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Recognizing the un-real McCoy: priming and the modularity of face recognition.
    Faulkner TF; Rhodes G; Palermo R; Pellicano E; Ferguson D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Jun; 9(2):327-34. PubMed ID: 12120796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.