These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Why is it easier to identify someone close than far away? Loftus GR; Harley EM Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Feb; 12(1):43-65. PubMed ID: 15948283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Spatial context in recognition. Bar M; Ullman S Perception; 1996; 25(3):343-52. PubMed ID: 8804097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Configural features in the context of upright and inverted faces. Leder H; Candrian G; Huber O; Bruce V Perception; 2001; 30(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 11257979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Face recognition is affected by similarity in spatial frequency range to a greater degree than within-category object recognition. Collin CA; Liu CH; Troje NF; McMullen PA; Chaudhuri A J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Oct; 30(5):975-87. PubMed ID: 15462634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Holistic processing unites face parts across time. Singer JM; Sheinberg DL Vision Res; 2006 May; 46(11):1838-47. PubMed ID: 16364394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Judgement of lateral orientation for previously seen and unseen photographs of faces. McKelvie SJ Percept Mot Skills; 1987 Apr; 64(2):431-45. PubMed ID: 3588189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Holistic processing is not correlated with face-identification accuracy. Konar Y; Bennett PJ; Sekuler AB Psychol Sci; 2010 Jan; 21(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 20424020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effects of lateral reversal on recognition memory for photographs of faces. McKelvie SJ Br J Psychol; 1983 Aug; 74 (Pt 3)():391-407. PubMed ID: 6616130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. What's so special about the average face? Tsao DY; Freiwald WA Trends Cogn Sci; 2006 Sep; 10(9):391-3. PubMed ID: 16899396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Investigation of a visual imagery mnemonic device for acquiring face--name associations. McCarty DL J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1980 Mar; 6(2):145-55. PubMed ID: 7373246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Identification of familiar and unfamiliar faces from internal and external features: some implications for theories of face recognition. Ellis HD; Shepherd JW; Davies GM Perception; 1979; 8(4):431-9. PubMed ID: 503774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Matching faces to photographs: poor performance in eyewitness memory (without the memory). Megreya AM; Burton AM J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Dec; 14(4):364-72. PubMed ID: 19102619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Likability of targets and distractors in facial recognition. Mueller JH; Heesacker M; Ross MJ Am J Psychol; 1984; 97(2):235-47. PubMed ID: 6731653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Temporal limitation of Navon effect on face recognition. Hills PJ; Lewis MB Percept Mot Skills; 2007 Apr; 104(2):501-9. PubMed ID: 17566440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effects of geometric distortions on face-recognition performance. Hole GJ; George PA; Eaves K; Rasek A Perception; 2002; 31(10):1221-40. PubMed ID: 12430949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Local and global minima in visual completion: effects of symmetry and orientation. Sekuler AB Perception; 1994; 23(5):529-45. PubMed ID: 7800468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The neuroanatomic basis of facial perception and variable facial discrimination ability: implications for orthodontics. Masella RS; Meister M Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):293-301. PubMed ID: 17826596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]