These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6473625)
1. A comparison between commercially available electrode gels and purpose-made gel, in the measurement of electrodermal activity. Grey SJ; Smith BL Psychophysiology; 1984 Sep; 21(5):551-7. PubMed ID: 6473625 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of electrodermal constant voltage and constant current recording techniques using the phase angle between alternating voltage and current. Schaefer F; Boucsein W Psychophysiology; 2000 Jan; 37(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 10705770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The use of purpose-made electrode gels in the measurement of electrodermal activity: a correction to Grey and Smith (1984). Clements K Psychophysiology; 1989 Jul; 26(4):495. PubMed ID: 2798698 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of UCS probability on the contingent negative variation and electrodermal response during long ISI conditioning. Backs RW; Grings WW Psychophysiology; 1985 May; 22(3):268-75. PubMed ID: 4011796 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A study on electrode gels for skin conductance measurements. Tronstad C; Johnsen GK; Grimnes S; Martinsen ØG Physiol Meas; 2010 Oct; 31(10):1395-410. PubMed ID: 20811086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [A hypothesis on the nature of electrodermal reactions]. Dementienko VV; Dorokhov VB; Koreneva LG; Markov AG; Tarasov AV; Shakhnarovich VM Fiziol Cheloveka; 2000; 26(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 10816949 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Electrophysiological parameters as biomarkers for psychiatry: Intra-individual variability and influencing factors. Sarlon J; Plaszczyk S; Engel S; Oertel-Knöchel V Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Jan; 123():42-47. PubMed ID: 29155050 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. An alternative to Unibase/glycol as an effective nonhydrating electrolyte medium for the measurement of electrodermal activity. Dormire SL; Carpenter JS Psychophysiology; 2002 Jul; 39(4):423-6. PubMed ID: 12212634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of electrodermal lability and stimulus significance on electrodermal response amplitude to stimulus change. Siddle DA; O'Gorman JG; Wood L Psychophysiology; 1979 Nov; 16(6):520-7. PubMed ID: 515295 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the methods of limits and electrodermal response for determination of lingual vibrotactile thresholds. McCaffrey P; Fucci D; Blackmon R Percept Mot Skills; 1976 Feb; 42(1):175-80. PubMed ID: 1256973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. To remove or not to remove? Removal of the unconditional stimulus electrode does not mediate instructed extinction effects. Luck CC; Lipp OV Psychophysiology; 2015 Sep; 52(9):1248-56. PubMed ID: 26032171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The characteristics of the electrodermal activity during changes in the level of human wakefulness]. Dementienko VV; Dorokhov VB; Koreneva LG; Markov AG; Shakhnarovich VM Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1999; 49(6):926-35. PubMed ID: 10693272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Continuous recordings of impedance and phase angle during electrodermal reactions and the locus of impedance change. Boucsein W; Schaefer F; Neijenhuisen H Psychophysiology; 1989 May; 26(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 2756087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]