These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 647577)
21. Recent patterns in cesarean delivery in the United States. Placek PJ; Taffel SM Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 1988 Dec; 15(4):607-27. PubMed ID: 3226670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evidence-based strategies for reducing cesarean section rates: a meta-analysis. Chaillet N; Dumont A Birth; 2007 Mar; 34(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 17324180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The impact of cesarean birth on subsequent fertility. Oral E; Elter K Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jun; 19(3):238-43. PubMed ID: 17495639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cesarean section rate levels off in 1987. Taffel SM; Placek PJ; Moien M Fam Plann Perspect; 1989; 21(5):227-8. PubMed ID: 2806490 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Reducing the cesarean section rate in a rural community hospital. Johnston RU CMAJ; 1992 Jun; 146(12):2137-8; author reply 2138-40. PubMed ID: 1530722 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Cesarean section: what is an acceptable rate? Mandel DC Can Med Assoc J; 1978 Sep; 119(5):406. PubMed ID: 688138 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The consensus process and evidence dissemination. Lomas J CMAJ; 1986 Jun; 134(12):1340-1. PubMed ID: 3708483 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Public health implications of cesarean on demand. Plante LA Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2006 Dec; 61(12):807-15. PubMed ID: 17107630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The relationship between cesarean delivery and gestational age among US singleton births. Bettegowda VR; Dias T; Davidoff MJ; Damus K; Callaghan WM; Petrini JR Clin Perinatol; 2008 Jun; 35(2):309-23, v-vi. PubMed ID: 18456071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cesarean section in America: dramatic trends, 1970 to 1987. Taffel SM Stat Bull Metrop Insur Co; 1989; 70(4):2-11. PubMed ID: 2609247 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Do family physicians 'prevent' cesarean sections? A Canadian exploration. Klein M Fam Med; 1988; 20(6):431-6. PubMed ID: 3243393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. High cesarean section rate: a new perspective. Porreco RP Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Mar; 65(3):307-11. PubMed ID: 4038791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The increasing rate of repeat cesarean section at a community FM residency program. Shatsky ML; Pressman KR Fam Med; 2005; 37(7):459-60. PubMed ID: 15988637 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Can a 29% cesarean delivery rate possibly be justified? Agnew G; Turner M Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 108(2):452; author reply 452. PubMed ID: 16880319 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. On cesarean section. Pearse WH Nebr Med J; 1981 Aug; 66(8):201-2. PubMed ID: 7254420 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of maternal mortality and morbidity between trial of labor and elective cesarean section among women with previous cesarean delivery. Wen SW; Rusen ID; Walker M; Liston R; Kramer MS; Baskett T; Heaman M; Liu S; Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Oct; 191(4):1263-9. PubMed ID: 15507951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cesarean delivery on maternal request: wise use of finite resources? A view from the trenches. Druzin ML; El-Sayed YY Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):305-8. PubMed ID: 17011403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]