453 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6475976)
1. Developing performance-appraisal systems.
Ross SR
Am J Hosp Pharm; 1984 Aug; 41(8):1567-73. PubMed ID: 6475976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance appraisal: a positive management tool.
Smith KE
Coll Rev; 1984; 1(2):43-62. PubMed ID: 10268509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development of a job-specific, criteria-based performance appraisal tool for staff pharmacists.
Hoffman RP
Hosp Pharm; 1986 Mar; 21(3):220-6. PubMed ID: 10275584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Staff pharmacists' opinions about performance appraisals.
Rao V; Rascati KL
Am J Hosp Pharm; 1993 Jun; 50(6):1181-5. PubMed ID: 8517458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Objective-focused approach for appraising the performance of institutional pharmacists.
Coarse JF; Kubica AJ
Am J Hosp Pharm; 1979 Dec; 36(12):1676-82. PubMed ID: 525644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance appraisal: can we 'manage' away the curse?
Lee C
Radiol Manage; 1997; 19(2):46-54. PubMed ID: 10166747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart.
Benedetto AR
Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(2):40-53. PubMed ID: 12800564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Staff evaluation.
Swartz AJ
Am J Hosp Pharm; 1979 Feb; 36(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 420206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Subordinate performance appraisal: what nurses really want in their managers.
Tayler CM
Can J Nurs Adm; 1992; 5(3):6-9. PubMed ID: 1463762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Making performance appraisal work.
Noble JE
Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):21-8. PubMed ID: 2640598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance appraisal, 1: Risks and rewards.
Romberg RV
Personnel; 1986 Aug; 63(8):20-6. PubMed ID: 10278732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The design and implementation of task oriented employee evaluations.
Hanna KJ; Sobecki DF
Hosp Pharm; 1984 Jun; 19(6):405-8, 411-3. PubMed ID: 10266567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Consistency in job descriptions, the interview process, and employee evaluations.
Lewis J
Am J Hosp Pharm; 1982 Apr; 39(4):643-4. PubMed ID: 7081243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Developing a usable performance appraisal system.
Brief AP
J Nurs Adm; 1979 Oct; 9(10):7-10. PubMed ID: 258663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A performance appraisal system for clinical pharmacy services.
Witte KW; Hutchinson RA
Curr Concepts Hosp Pharm Manage; 1984; 6(2):12-5. PubMed ID: 10265721
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance appraisal: the legal implications of Title VII.
Lubben GL; Thompson DE; Klasson CR
Personnel; 1980; 57(3):11-21. PubMed ID: 10247390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Criteria-based performance appraisals.
Lerch EM
Nurs Manage; 1982 Jul; 13(7):28-30. PubMed ID: 6920625
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Staff development. Appraisals reassessed.
Watson J
Health Soc Serv J; 1984 Jun; 94(4901):708. PubMed ID: 10267770
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Appraising the performance of performance appraisal.
Brinkerhoff DW; Kanter RM
Sloan Manage Rev; 1980; 21(3):3-16. PubMed ID: 10249849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How developmental supervision and performance management improve effectiveness.
Benjamin S; Penland T
Health Care Superv; 1995 Dec; 14(2):19-28. PubMed ID: 10153618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
