These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6477179)
1. [Hemodynamic evaluation of the Biocor heterologous prosthesis]. Barbosa MR; Azevedo Sobrinho AL; Vrandecic MO; Chaves JC; Amaral JJ; de Mendonça JV; Miari R Arq Bras Cardiol; 1984 Feb; 42(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 6477179 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Hemodynamic evaluation of mitral and aortic bioprosthesis. Apropos of 27 Carpentier-Edwards and 7 hancock (standard model) prostheses]. Leroy G; Lelguen C; Juillard A; d'Auzac C; Fernandez F; Gerbaux A Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1982 Apr; 75(4):459-67. PubMed ID: 6808955 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Hemodynamic assessment of patients with aortic or mitral valve replacement during exercise (author's transl)]. Kraus F; Rudolph W Herz; 1981 Jun; 6(3):138-47. PubMed ID: 7250886 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Clinical relevance of steady-state conditions and heart rate increase during exercise in the detection of pathologic hemodynamics in patients with prosthetic aortic or mitral valve (author's transl)]. Kraus F; Dacian S; Rudolph W Herz; 1981 Aug; 6(4):237-46. PubMed ID: 7262814 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Hemodynamic evaluation of the Integral Björk-Shiley prosthesis (monostrut) in aortic and mitral prostheses]. Augé JM; Crexells C; Oriol A Rev Esp Cardiol; 1988 Mar; 41(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 3387639 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Low profile bioprosthesis for cardiac valve replacement:hydraulic and hemodynamic studies. Navia JA; Haller JD; Gimenez C; Pujadas G; Tamashiro A; Vidal DZ; Liotta D Med Instrum; 1982; 16(1):57-9. PubMed ID: 7062868 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Hemodynamic evaluation of the St. Jude Medical valve prosthesis in the small aortic anulus. Wortham DC; Tri TB; Bowen TE J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1981 Apr; 81(4):615-20. PubMed ID: 7206770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Hemodynamic evaluation of the bioprosthesis in mitral position (author's transl)]. Maeta H; Hiratsuka H; Tanaka T; Matsumoto M; Tamura H; Itoh K; Nakagawa K Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1977 Sep; 25(9):1202-10. PubMed ID: 563895 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The Omnicarbon tilting-disc heart valve prosthesis. A clinical and Doppler echocardiographic follow-up. Peter M; Weiss P; Jenzer HR; Hoffmann A; Dubach P; Roth J; Bertschmann W; Stulz P; Grädel E; Burckhardt D J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Oct; 106(4):599-608. PubMed ID: 8412252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Seventeen-year experience with the St. Jude medical biocor porcine bioprosthesis. Mykén PS J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):486-92. PubMed ID: 16116875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Clinical problems of biological and mechanical valves--comparative study of mitral valve replacement with a biological valve and aortic valve replacement with a mechanical valve]. Komatsu S; Tanaka N Rinsho Kyobu Geka; 1981; 1(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 7052583 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Hemodynamic function of the Hancock standard orifice aortic valve bioprosthesis. Borkon AM; McIntosh CL; Jones M; Lipson LC; Kent KM; Morrow AG J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1981 Oct; 82(4):601-7. PubMed ID: 7278353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]