These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6478701)

  • 21. Porosity of various preparations of acrylic bone cements.
    Jasty M; Davies JP; O'Connor DO; Burke DW; Harrigan TP; Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1990 Oct; (259):122-9. PubMed ID: 2208846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of diametral shrinkage of centrifuged and uncentrifuged Simplex P bone cement.
    Davies JP; Harris WH
    J Appl Biomater; 1995; 6(3):209-11. PubMed ID: 7492813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [A study on the mechanical properties of bone cement (methylmethacrylate) and its strength alteration in vivo (author's transl)].
    Kon H
    Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi; 1981 Jan; 55(1):71-83. PubMed ID: 7276662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of centrifugation on the fatigue life of bone cement in the presence of surface irregularities.
    Davies JP; O'Connor DO; Burke DW; Jasty M; Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Apr; (229):156-61. PubMed ID: 3349670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of fat admixture on the strengths of conventional and low-viscosity bone cements.
    Ferracane JL; Wixson RL; Lautenschlager EP
    J Orthop Res; 1984; 1(4):450-3. PubMed ID: 6491793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effects of abutment taper, length and cement type on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
    Bernal G; Okamura M; Muñoz CA
    J Prosthodont; 2003 Jun; 12(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 12964683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Factors affecting surgical alloy/bone cement interface adhesion.
    Keller JC; Lautenschlager EP; Marshall GW; Meyer PR
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1980 Sep; 14(5):639-51. PubMed ID: 7349670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Relative influence of composition and viscosity of acrylic bone cement on its apparent fracture toughness.
    Lewis G
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2000; 10(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 10950202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of two variables on the fatigue performance of acrylic bone cement: mixing method and viscosity.
    Lewis G
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1999; 9(4):197-207. PubMed ID: 10674174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Vacuum mixing of acrylic bone cement.
    Wixson RL; Lautenschlager EP; Novak MA
    J Arthroplasty; 1987; 2(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 3612140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mechanical properties of bone cement: a review.
    Saha S; Pal S
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1984 Apr; 18(4):435-62. PubMed ID: 6376513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mechanical properties of bone cement. Importance of the mixing technique.
    Lindén U
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1991 Nov; (272):274-8. PubMed ID: 1934744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Mechanical properties of new low viscosity bone cements--can be improved by vacuum mixing].
    Kaltenkirchen N; Fritsch E; Rupp S; Kraus P
    Unfallchirurg; 1996 Jul; 99(7):492-7. PubMed ID: 8928019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Mechanical characterization of commercially made carbon-fiber-reinforced polymethylmethacrylate.
    Saha S; Pal S
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1986; 20(6):817-26. PubMed ID: 3722216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Creep characteristics of hand- and vacuum-mixed acrylic bone cement at elevated stress levels.
    Norman TL; Kish V; Blaha JD; Gruen TA; Hustosky K
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1995 Apr; 29(4):495-501. PubMed ID: 7622534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Mechanical strength of poly(methyl methacrylate) cement-human bone interfaces.
    Kusleika R; Stupp SI
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1983 May; 17(3):441-58. PubMed ID: 6863348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Strain-controlled fatigue of acrylic bone cement.
    Carter DR; Gates EI; Harris WH
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1982 Sep; 16(5):647-57. PubMed ID: 7130218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Retention strengths of five luting cements on prefabricated dowels after root canal obturation with a zinc oxide/eugenol sealer: 1. Dowel space preparation/cementation at one week after obturation.
    Hagge MS; Wong RD; Lindemuth JS
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 12237797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of centrifugation on the fracture properties of acrylic bone cements.
    Rimnac CM; Wright TM; McGill DL
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1986 Feb; 68(2):281-7. PubMed ID: 3944165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mechanical properties of poly(methyl methacrylate) bone cements.
    Robinson RP; Wright TM; Burstein AH
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1981 Mar; 15(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 7348714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.