These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6479142)

  • 1. Fuzzy modelling of stresses in manual lifting tasks.
    Karwowski W; Ayoub MM
    Ergonomics; 1984 Jun; 27(6):641-9. PubMed ID: 6479142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Metabolic costs of load carriage with different container sizes.
    Morrissey SJ; Liou YH
    Ergonomics; 1984 Aug; 27(8):847-53. PubMed ID: 6489312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An ergonomic comparison between mechanical and manual patient transfer techniques.
    Silvia CE; Bloswick DS; Lillquist D; Wallace D; Perkins MS
    Work; 2002; 19(1):19-34. PubMed ID: 12454348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Physiological guidelines for the design of manual lifting and lowering tasks: the state of the art.
    Asfour SS; Genaidy AM; Mital A
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1988 Apr; 49(4):150-60. PubMed ID: 3287879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction of metabolic rates for manual materials handling jobs.
    Garg A; Chaffin DB; Herrin GD
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1978 Aug; 39(8):661-74. PubMed ID: 696629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simulation of manual materials handling: biomechanial assessment under different lifting conditions.
    Gündogdu O; Anderson KS; Parnianpour M
    Technol Health Care; 2005; 13(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 15706064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Developing norms for manual carrying tasks using mechanical efficiency as the optimization criterion.
    Dutta SP; Taboun S
    Ergonomics; 1989 Aug; 32(8):919-43. PubMed ID: 2806224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Physiologic responses to static, dynamic and combined work.
    Asfour SS; Genaidy AM; Khalil TM; Muthuswamy S
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1986 Dec; 47(12):798-802. PubMed ID: 3799482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evaluation of methods assessing the physical demands of manual lifting in scaffolding.
    van der Beek AJ; Erik Mathiassen S; Windhorst J; Burdorf A
    Appl Ergon; 2005 Mar; 36(2):213-22. PubMed ID: 15694076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Low-back stresses when learning to use a materials handling device.
    Chaffin DB; Stump BS; Nussbaum MA; Baker G
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jan; 42(1):94-110. PubMed ID: 9973874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A method for evaluating the biomechanical stresses resulting from manual materials handling jobs.
    Chaffin DB; Herrin GD; Keyserling WM; Garg A
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1977 Dec; 38(12):662-75. PubMed ID: 930817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of box weight, vertical location and symmetry on lifting capacities and ratings on category scale in Japanese female workers.
    Hattori Y; Ono Y; Shimaoka M; Hiruta S; Shibata E; Ando S; Hori F; Takeuchi Y
    Ergonomics; 2000 Dec; 43(12):2031-42. PubMed ID: 11191784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Determination of job heaviness and heat exposure in two industrial tasks.
    Botzum GD; Dorsey CP
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1974 Jun; 35(6):362-5. PubMed ID: 4838991
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dynamic biomechanical modelling of symmetric and asymmetric lifting tasks in restricted postures.
    Gallagher S; Hamrick CA; Love AC; Marras WS
    Ergonomics; 1994 Aug; 37(8):1289-310. PubMed ID: 7925254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ergonomics: a new frontier in medical engineering.
    Kadefors R
    Med Prog Technol; 1982; 9(2-3):149-52. PubMed ID: 7162484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The physiologic effect of lifting weights from the floor and working surface at different rates].
    Moĭkin IuV; Kokhanova NA; Elizarova VV; Shardakova EF; Murav'eva OI; Gontsova LA
    Gig Tr Prof Zabol; 1990; (5):24-8. PubMed ID: 2379845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Physiological approach in manual lifting: work rate recommendations and a comparison with the psychophysical approach.
    Mital A; Asfour SS; Ayoub MM
    J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 1982 Dec; 11(2):143-56. PubMed ID: 7186928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Heart rate response to two lifting techniques.
    Revuelta N; Dauphin A; Kowslowski O; Dubois D; Thevenon A
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2000 Jul; 81(7):958-9. PubMed ID: 10896012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An evaluation of predictive methods for estimating cumulative spinal loading.
    Callaghan JP; Salewytsch AJ; Andrews DM
    Ergonomics; 2001 Jul; 44(9):825-37. PubMed ID: 11560364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acceptable weights and physiological costs of performing combined manual handling tasks in restricted postures.
    Gallagher S
    Ergonomics; 1991 Jul; 34(7):939-52. PubMed ID: 1915255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.