251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6480334)
21. Federal commissions and local IRBs.
Yesley MS
Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Oct; 13(5):11-2. PubMed ID: 6643032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The burgeoning law of medical experimentation involving human subjects.
Bryant LE
John Marshall J Pract Proced; 1974; 8(1):19-51. PubMed ID: 11663465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Research plan on brown lung drew criticism.
Moore M
Washington Post; 1984 May; ():A1, A40. PubMed ID: 11646377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Using the brain dead for medical research.
Martyn SR
Utah Law Rev; 1986; 1986(1):1-28. PubMed ID: 11651917
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The regulation of human experimentation in the United States--a personal odyssey.
Katz J
IRB; 1987; 9(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 11649890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Legal and ethical concepts involved in informed consent to human research.
Woody KJ
Calif West Law Rev; 1981; 18(1):50-79. PubMed ID: 11658328
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Recommended health-based occupational exposure limits for selected vegetable dusts.
World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser; 1983; 684():1-78. PubMed ID: 6408809
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Human experimentation: the review process in practice.
Cowan DH
Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):533-64. PubMed ID: 11661165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Federal policy for the protection of human subjects. Final rule.
Fed Regist; 1991 Jun; 56(117):28003-18. PubMed ID: 10112214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Role of histamine in the aetiology of byssinosis. I Blood histamine concentrations in workers exposed to cotton and flax dusts.
Noweir MH; Abdel-Kader HM; Omran F
Br J Ind Med; 1984 May; 41(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 6202313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Non-therapeutic medical research involving human subjects.
Bloom MJ
Syracuse Law Rev; 1973; 24():1067-1099. PubMed ID: 11664224
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Human experimentation: the regulation controversy.
Society; 1975; 13(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 11662982
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Protection of human subjects; proposed establishment of regulations.
Fed Regist; 1979 Apr; 44(80):24106-11. PubMed ID: 10241036
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The development of a cotton dust standard.
Imbus HR
J Occup Med; 1974 Aug; 16(8):547-51. PubMed ID: 4843404
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Pulmonary response of mice to aqueous cotton dust extract.
Abebe Y
East Afr Med J; 2000 Jan; 77(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 10944841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Clinical and functional studies of workers in cotton-spinning factories].
Kapralov GM
Gig Tr Prof Zabol; 1977; (6):48-9. PubMed ID: 892545
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Who shall decide when doctors disagree? A review of the legal development of informed consent and the implications of proposed lay review of human experimentation.
Ratnoff MF
Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):472-532. PubMed ID: 11661164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. FDA revises informed consent regulations for emergency research.
Menasché A; Levine RJ
IRB; 1995; 17(5-6):19-22. PubMed ID: 11653359
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Alteration in the modulatory role of respiratory epithelium after exposure of guinea pigs to respirable cotton dust.
Smith JA; Frazer DG; Fedan JS
J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1993 Feb; 264(2):683-8. PubMed ID: 8437116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Variations of pulmonary function amongst workers in cotton mills.
Barnes R; Simpson GR
J Occup Med; 1976 Aug; 18(8):551-5. PubMed ID: 956940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
