These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6480521)

  • 1. Analysis of the frequency following response in the cat.
    Davis RL; Britt RH
    Hear Res; 1984 Jul; 15(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 6480521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Frequency-dependent fine structure in the frequency-following response: The byproduct of multiple generators.
    Tichko P; Skoe E
    Hear Res; 2017 May; 348():1-15. PubMed ID: 28137699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Origins of the scalp recorded frequency-following response in the cat.
    Gardi J; Merzenich M; McKean C
    Audiology; 1979; 18(5):358-81. PubMed ID: 496719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selectively eliminating cochlear microphonic contamination from the frequency-following response.
    Chimento TC; Schreiner CE
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1990 Feb; 75(2):88-96. PubMed ID: 1688778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multichannel recordings of the human brainstem frequency-following response: scalp topography, source generators, and distinctions from the transient ABR.
    Bidelman GM
    Hear Res; 2015 May; 323():68-80. PubMed ID: 25660195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differential Group Delay of the Frequency Following Response Measured Vertically and Horizontally.
    King A; Hopkins K; Plack CJ
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2016 Apr; 17(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 26920344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Remotely recorded cochlear microphonic in the cat.
    Laukli E; Mair IW
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1983; 238(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 6882278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contributing generator of frequency-following response in man.
    Yamada O; Marsh RR; Handler SD
    Scand Audiol; 1982; 11(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 7178803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Generators of the frequency-following response in the guinea pig.
    Yamada O; Marsh RR; Potsic WP
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (1979); 1980; 88(5):613-8. PubMed ID: 7443268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Simultaneously-evoked auditory potentials (SEAP): A new method for concurrent measurement of cortical and subcortical auditory-evoked activity.
    Slugocki C; Bosnyak D; Trainor LJ
    Hear Res; 2017 Mar; 345():30-42. PubMed ID: 28043881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differences between auditory frequency-following responses and onset responses: Intracranial evidence from rat inferior colliculus.
    Wang Q; Li L
    Hear Res; 2018 Jan; 357():25-32. PubMed ID: 29156225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 40-Hz steady state response in awake cats after bilateral chronic lesions in auditory cortices or inferior colliculi.
    Tsuzuku T
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 1993; 20(4):263-74. PubMed ID: 8172538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An experimental study on the generator of amplitude-modulation following response.
    Kiren T; Aoyagi M; Furuse H; Koike Y
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1994; 511():28-33. PubMed ID: 8203239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Brain stem auditory evoked response development in the kitten.
    Shipley C; Buchwald JS; Norman R; Guthrie D
    Brain Res; 1980 Jan; 182(2):313-26. PubMed ID: 7357388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Simultaneous subcortical and cortical electrophysiological recordings of spectro-temporal processing in humans.
    Calcus A; Undurraga JA; Vickers D
    Front Neurol; 2022; 13():928158. PubMed ID: 35989907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Frequency following auditory brain stem responses in man.
    Huis in't Veld F; Osterhammel P; Terkildsen K
    Scand Audiol; 1977; 6(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 594634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cochlear distribution of frequency-following response initiation. A high-pass masking noise study.
    Yamada O; Kodera K; Hink RF; Suzuki JI
    Audiology; 1979; 18(5):381-7. PubMed ID: 496720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sources of frequency following responses (FFR) in man.
    Sohmer H; Pratt H; Kinarti R
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1977 May; 42(5):656-64. PubMed ID: 67025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Properties of spatial receptive fields in the central nucleus of the cat inferior colliculus. I. Responses to tones of low intensity.
    Moore DR; Semple MN; Addison PD; Aitkin LM
    Hear Res; 1984 Feb; 13(2):159-74. PubMed ID: 6715263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of cTBS on the Frequency-Following Response and Other Auditory Evoked Potentials.
    López-Caballero F; Martin-Trias P; Ribas-Prats T; Gorina-Careta N; Bartrés-Faz D; Escera C
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2020; 14():250. PubMed ID: 32733220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.