These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6480951)
21. Challenging a paradigm: skin sensitivity to sodium lauryl sulfate is independent of atopic diathesis. Heetfeld AB; Schill T; Schröder SS; Forkel S; Mahler V; Pfützner W; Schön MP; Geier J; Buhl T Br J Dermatol; 2020 Jul; 183(1):139-145. PubMed ID: 31562780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Quantification of allergic and irritant patch test reactions using ImageJ. Ohshima H; Kinoshita S; Futagawa M; Takiwaki H; Washizaki K; Ishiko A; Kanto H Skin Res Technol; 2014 May; 20(2):177-81. PubMed ID: 24118475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The influence of patch test size and design on the distribution of erythema induced by sodium lauryl sulfate. Nicholson M; Willis CM Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Nov; 41(5):264-7. PubMed ID: 10554060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Triclosan protects the skin against dermatitis caused by sodium lauryl sulphate exposure. Barkvoll P; Rølla G J Clin Periodontol; 1994 Nov; 21(10):717-9. PubMed ID: 7852618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. 'Irritants' increase the response to an allergen in allergic contact dermatitis. McLelland J; Shuster S; Matthews JN Arch Dermatol; 1991 Jul; 127(7):1016-9. PubMed ID: 2064399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The MOAHLFA index of irritant sodium lauryl sulfate reactions: first results of a multicentre study on routine sodium lauryl sulfate patch testing. Uter W; Geier J; Becker D; Brasch J; Löffler H Contact Dermatitis; 2004; 51(5-6):259-62. PubMed ID: 15606650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Irritancy testing in occupational dermatology: comparison between two quick tests and the acute irritation induced by sodium lauryl sulphate. Bangha E; Hinnen U; Elsner P Acta Derm Venereol; 1996 Nov; 76(6):450-2. PubMed ID: 8982409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Reproducibility of irritant patch test reactions to sodium lauryl sulfate in a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized study using clinical scoring. Results from a study group of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG). Brasch J; Becker D; Effendy I Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Sep; 41(3):150-5. PubMed ID: 10475514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effects of skin occlusion in patch testing with sodium lauryl sulphate. Friebe K; Effendy I; Löffler H Br J Dermatol; 2003 Jan; 148(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 12534596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Clinical morphology of sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) and nonanoic acid (NAA) irritant patch test reactions at 48 h and 96 h in 152 subjects. Reiche L; Willis C; Wilkinson J; Shaw S; de Lacharrière O Contact Dermatitis; 1998 Nov; 39(5):240-3. PubMed ID: 9840260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Stratum corneum profiles of inflammatory mediators in patch test reactions to common contact allergens and sodium lauryl sulfate. Koppes SA; Ljubojevic Hadzavdic S; Jakasa I; Franceschi N; Jurakić Tončić R; Marinović B; Brans R; Gibbs S; Frings-Dresen MHW; Rustemeyer T; Kezic S Br J Dermatol; 2017 Jun; 176(6):1533-1540. PubMed ID: 28382616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Pitfalls of irritant patch testing using different test chamber sizes. Löffler H; Freyschmidt-Paul P; Effendy I; Maibach HI Am J Contact Dermat; 2001 Mar; 12(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 11244137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluation of lotion formulations on irritation using the modified forearm-controlled application test method. Farage MA; Ebrahimpour A; Steimle B; Englehart J; Smith D Skin Res Technol; 2007 Aug; 13(3):268-79. PubMed ID: 17610648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Differential patterns of epidermal leukocyte infiltration in patch test reactions to structurally unrelated chemical irritants. Willis CM; Stephens CJ; Wilkinson JD J Invest Dermatol; 1993 Sep; 101(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 8370975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Delayed time course of irritation by sodium lauryl sulfate: observations on threshold reactions. Bruynzeel DP; van Ketel WG; Scheper RJ; von Blomberg-van der Flier BM Contact Dermatitis; 1982 Jul; 8(4):236-9. PubMed ID: 7105685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Allergic contact dermatitis from ophthalmic products: can pre-treatment with sodium lauryl sulfate increase patch test sensitivity? Corazza M; Virgili A Contact Dermatitis; 2005 May; 52(5):239-41. PubMed ID: 15898995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The tandem repeated irritation test: a new method to assess prevention of irritant combination damage to the skin. Wigger-Alberti W; Spoo J; Schliemann-Willers S; Klotz A; Elsner P Acta Derm Venereol; 2002; 82(2):94-7. PubMed ID: 12125960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Cutaneous sodium lauryl sulphate irritation potential: age and regional variability. Cua AB; Wilhelm KP; Maibach HI Br J Dermatol; 1990 Nov; 123(5):607-13. PubMed ID: 2248890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effects of different base agents on prediction of skin irritation by sodium lauryl sulfate using patch testing and repeated application test. Horita K; Horita D; Tomita H; Yasoshima M; Yagami A; Matsunaga K Toxicology; 2017 May; 382():10-15. PubMed ID: 28274658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Influence of climatic conditions on the irritant patch test with sodium lauryl sulphate. Loffler H; Happle R Acta Derm Venereol; 2003; 83(5):338-41. PubMed ID: 14609099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]