These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6480991)

  • 1. Perception of temporal differences in speech by "normal-hearing" adults: effects of age and intensity.
    Price PJ; Simon HJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Aug; 76(2):405-10. PubMed ID: 6480991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech-in-speech listening on the LiSN-S test by older adults with good audiograms depends on cognition and hearing acuity at high frequencies.
    Besser J; Festen JM; Goverts ST; Kramer SE; Pichora-Fuller MK
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):24-41. PubMed ID: 25207850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Age-related differences in identification and discrimination of temporal cues in speech segments.
    Gordon-Salant S; Yeni-Komshian GH; Fitzgibbons PJ; Barrett J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Apr; 119(4):2455-66. PubMed ID: 16642858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Temporal intraspeech masking of plosive bursts: effects of hearing loss and frequency shaping.
    Mackersie CL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Jun; 50(3):554-63. PubMed ID: 17538099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Age-related differences in processing dynamic information to identify vowel quality.
    Fox RA; Wall LG; Gokcen J
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Aug; 35(4):892-902. PubMed ID: 1405544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Vowel identification by younger and older listeners: relative effectiveness of vowel edges and vowel centers.
    Donaldson GS; Talmage EK; Rogers CL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):EL105-10. PubMed ID: 20815425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Audiometric characteristics of a Dutch family with Muckle-Wells syndrome.
    Weegerink NJ; Schraders M; Leijendeckers J; Slieker K; Huygen PL; Hoefsloot L; Oostrik J; Pennings RJ; Simon A; Snik A; Kremer H; Kunst HP
    Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):243-51. PubMed ID: 21810457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of speaker age on speech recognition and perceived listening effort in older adults with hearing loss.
    McAuliffe MJ; Wilding PJ; Rickard NA; O'Beirne GA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Jun; 55(3):838-47. PubMed ID: 22232404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of noise exposure and musical training on suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise.
    Yeend I; Beach EF; Sharma M; Dillon H
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():224-236. PubMed ID: 28780178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vocabulary influences older and younger listeners' processing of dysarthric speech.
    McAuliffe MJ; Gibson EM; Kerr SE; Anderson T; LaShell PJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1358-68. PubMed ID: 23927132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Occlusive silence duration of voiceless intervocalic plosives and voicing perception by normal and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Cazals Y
    Ear Hear; 1994 Oct; 15(5):404-8. PubMed ID: 7813827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recognition of low-pass-filtered consonants in noise with normal and impaired high-frequency hearing.
    Horwitz AR; Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jan; 111(1 Pt 1):409-16. PubMed ID: 11831814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Age-Related Differences in the Processing of Temporal Envelope and Spectral Cues in a Speech Segment.
    Goupell MJ; Gaskins CR; Shader MJ; Walter EP; Anderson S; Gordon-Salant S
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(6):e335-e342. PubMed ID: 28562426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of increasing consonant/vowel intensity ratio on speech loudness.
    Montgomery AA; Prosek RA; Walden BE; Cord MT
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):221-8. PubMed ID: 3430381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Acoustic changes in the production of lexical stress during Lombard speech.
    Arciuli J; Simpson BS; Vogel AP; Ballard KJ
    Lang Speech; 2014 Jun; 57(Pt 2):149-62. PubMed ID: 25102603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario.
    Neher T; Wagener KC; Latzel M
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():36-48. PubMed ID: 28783570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Suprathreshold auditory processing deficits in noise: Effects of hearing loss and age.
    Kortlang S; Mauermann M; Ewert SD
    Hear Res; 2016 Jan; 331():27-40. PubMed ID: 26471199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.