These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6481053)

  • 1. Decision making in the care of terminally ill incompetent persons: concerns about the role of the courts.
    Mariner WK
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 1984 Oct; 32(10):739-46. PubMed ID: 6481053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reconciling Quinlan and Saikewicz: decision making for the terminally ill incompetent.
    Annas GJ
    Am J Law Med; 1979; 4(4):367-96. PubMed ID: 507056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Silent decisions: limits of consent and the terminally ill patient.
    Brennan TA
    Law Med Health Care; 1988; 16(3-4):204-9. PubMed ID: 3205051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Termination of medical treatment: a judicial perspective.
    Ackerman JW; Pope MC
    J Leg Med; 1982 Jun; 3(2):211-43. PubMed ID: 6981677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Treatment decisions for patients without surrogates: rethinking policies for a vulnerable population.
    Miller TE; Coleman CH; Cugliari AM
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 1997 Mar; 45(3):369-74. PubMed ID: 9063286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Helga Wanglie revisited: medical futility and the limits of autonomy.
    Johnson DH
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1993; 2(2):161-70. PubMed ID: 8293205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Substitute consent. Reconciling negative treatment and consent to routine medical treatment.
    Sappington GM
    J Leg Med; 1986 Sep; 7(3):341-55. PubMed ID: 3490528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Decisionmaking for the incompetent terminally ill patient: a compromise in a solution eliminates a compromise of patients' rights.
    Knezevich CA
    Indiana Law J; 1982; 57(2):325-48. PubMed ID: 11649706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Withdrawal and withholding of life-support in terminally ill patients. Part I.
    Solnick PB
    Med Law; 1984 Sep; 3(4):303-32. PubMed ID: 11651779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Law and public policy. The case for the courts.
    Baron C
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 1984 Oct; 32(10):734-8. PubMed ID: 6481052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can healthcare providers obtain judicial intervention against surrogates who demand "medically inappropriate" life support for incompetent patients?
    Cantor NL
    Crit Care Med; 1996 May; 24(5):883-7. PubMed ID: 8706470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Judicial postponement of death recognition: the tragic case of Mary O'Connor.
    Gindes D
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):301-31. PubMed ID: 2513713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Canadian Charter of Rights and individual choice in treatment.
    Ferguson G
    Health Law Can; 1988; 8(3):63-70, 85. PubMed ID: 10312613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Proxy consent for incompetent non-terminally ill adult patients.
    Solnick PB
    J Leg Med; 1985 Mar; 6(1):1-49. PubMed ID: 3889203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Post-Saikewicz judicial actions clarify the rights of patients and families.
    Glantz LH
    Medicoleg News; 1978; 6(4):9-11. PubMed ID: 10240215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The right of elderly patients to refuse life-sustaining treatment.
    Annas GJ; Glantz LH
    Milbank Q; 1986; 64(Suppl. 2):95-162. PubMed ID: 11649886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Refusal of life-sustaining treatment for terminally ill incompetent patients: court orders and an alternative.
    Rubin BL
    Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1985; 19(1):19-68. PubMed ID: 11658755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preserving personal autonomy for the elderly. Competency, guardianship, and Alzheimer's disease.
    Rosoff AJ; Gottlieb GL
    J Leg Med; 1987 Mar; 8(1):1-47. PubMed ID: 3495620
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Who shall live, who shall die. Who decides?
    Hirsh HL; Cuneo MK
    Med Law; 1986; 5(2):111-50. PubMed ID: 3713456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Withholding of life-sustaining treatment from the terminally ill, incompetent patient: who decides? Part II.
    Suber DG; Tabor WJ
    JAMA; 1982 Nov; 248(19):2431-2. PubMed ID: 7131695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.