129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6481895)
1. Composite sequential grafts in severe ischemia: a comparative study.
Flinn WR; Ricco JB; Yao JS; McDaniel MD; King TA; Bergan JJ
J Vasc Surg; 1984 May; 1(3):449-54. PubMed ID: 6481895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. PTFE-vein composite grafts for critical limb ischaemia: a valuable alternative to all-autogenous infrageniculate reconstructions.
Bastounis E; Georgopoulos S; Maltezos C; Alexiou D; Chiotopoulos D; Bramis J
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 1999 Aug; 18(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 10426969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The consequences of a failed femoropopliteal bypass grafting: comparison of saphenous vein and PTFE grafts.
Jackson MR; Belott TP; Dickason T; Kaiser WJ; Modrall JG; Valentine RJ; Clagett GP
J Vasc Surg; 2000 Sep; 32(3):498-504; 504-5. PubMed ID: 10957656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of graft type on patency of infrainguinal arterial bypass grafts.
Neale ML; Graham JC; Lane RJ; Cheung DS; Appleberg M
J Am Coll Surg; 1994 Feb; 178(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 8173726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The use of composite grafts in femorocrural bypasses performed for limb salvage: a review of 108 consecutive cases and comparison with 57 in situ saphenous vein bypasses.
Feinberg RL; Winter RP; Wheeler JR; Gregory RT; Snyder SO; Gayle RG; Parent FN; Adcock GD
J Vasc Surg; 1990 Sep; 12(3):257-63. PubMed ID: 2398584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Infrapopliteal polytetrafluoroethylene and composite bypass: factors influencing patency.
Fichelle JM; Marzelle J; Colacchio G; Gigou F; Cormier F; Cormier JM
Ann Vasc Surg; 1995 Mar; 9(2):187-96. PubMed ID: 7786705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patency of autogenous saphenous vein versus polytetrafluoroethylene grafts in femoropopliteal bypass for advanced ischemia of the extremity.
Bennion RS; Williams RA; Stabile BE; Fox MA; Owens ML; Wilson SE
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1985 Mar; 160(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 3975795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Distal femoropopliteal bypass using a composite graft of PTFE and non-reversed saphenous vein.
Holdsworth PJ; Riddell PS; Leveson SH
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1989 Jan; 71(1):4-6. PubMed ID: 2923418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Femoropopliteal vascular replacement: vein, ePTFE or ovine collagen?].
Koch G; Gutschi S; Pascher O; Fruhwirth J; Hauser H
Zentralbl Chir; 1996; 121(9):761-7. PubMed ID: 9012236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Results of prosthetic grafts in femoro-crural bypass operations as compared to autogenous saphenous vein grafts.
Van de Pavoordt HD; Eikelboom BC; De Geest R; Vermeulen FE
Neth J Surg; 1986 Dec; 38(6):177-9. PubMed ID: 2949165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Femoropopliteal bypass: saphenous vein and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts.
Wooster DL; Provan JL; Sojka SG; Madras PN
Can J Surg; 1982 Nov; 25(6):666-9. PubMed ID: 7139424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Composite sequential grafts for femorocrural bypass reconstruction: experience with a modified technique.
Mahmood A; Garnham A; Sintler M; Smith SR; Vohra RK; Simms MH
J Vasc Surg; 2002 Oct; 36(4):772-8. PubMed ID: 12368738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Dacron and polytetrafluoroethylene aorto-bifemoral grafts].
Davidović LB; Lotina SI; Kostić DM; Cinara II; Cvetković SD; Stojanović PL; Velimirović LB; Marković DM; Pejkić SL; Pavlović G
Srp Arh Celok Lek; 1997; 125(3-4):75-83. PubMed ID: 9221522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pedal bypass versus tibial bypass with autogenous vein: a comparison of outcome and hemodynamic results.
Schneider JR; Walsh DB; McDaniel MD; Zwolak RM; Besso SR; Cronenwett JL
J Vasc Surg; 1993 Jun; 17(6):1029-38; discussion 1038-40. PubMed ID: 8505781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bypass to plantar and tarsal arteries: an acceptable approach to limb salvage.
Hughes K; Domenig CM; Hamdan AD; Schermerhorn M; Aulivola B; Blattman S; Campbell DR; Scovell SD; LoGerfo FW; Pomposelli FB
J Vasc Surg; 2004 Dec; 40(6):1149-57. PubMed ID: 15622369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Infrapopliteal bypass for severe ischemia: comparison of autogenous vein, composite, and prosthetic grafts.
Londrey GL; Ramsey DE; Hodgson KJ; Barkmeier LD; Sumner DS
J Vasc Surg; 1991 May; 13(5):631-6. PubMed ID: 2027201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors influencing the outcome of paramalleolar bypass grafts.
Plecha EJ; Lee C; Hye RJ
Ann Vasc Surg; 1996 Jul; 10(4):356-60. PubMed ID: 8879390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. PTFE bypass to below-knee arteries: distal vein collar or not? A prospective randomised multicentre study.
SCAMICOS
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2010 Jun; 39(6):747-54. PubMed ID: 20236841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adjunctive techniques to improve patency of distal prosthetic bypass grafts: polytetrafluoroethylene with remote arteriovenous fistulae versus vein cuffs.
Kreienberg PB; Darling RC; Chang BB; Paty PS; Lloyd WE; Shah DM
J Vasc Surg; 2000 Apr; 31(4):696-701. PubMed ID: 10753277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Supragenicular bypass: venous in comparison with synthetic prosthesis (PTFE)].
Achermann A; Gürke L; Stirnemann P
Swiss Surg; 1998; 4(3):129-32. PubMed ID: 9655007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
