These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6482059)

  • 1. Reevaluation of the biological certification test for the class II biological safety cabinets.
    Hino S; Sato H
    Jpn J Exp Med; 1984 Feb; 54(1):39-49. PubMed ID: 6482059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Collison 6-jet nebulizer: choice for the certification test of the class II biological safety cabinet.
    Hino S; Sato H
    Jpn J Exp Med; 1984 Feb; 54(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 6482058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Flow and performance of an air-curtain biological safety cabinet.
    Huang RF; Chou CI
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2009 Jun; 53(4):425-40. PubMed ID: 19398506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Design modifications of a class II biological safety cabinet and user guidelines for enhancing safety.
    Stimpfel TM; Gershey EL
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1991 Jan; 52(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 1996536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving the biosafety of cell sorting by adaptation of a cell sorting system to a biosafety cabinet.
    Lennartz K; Lu M; Flasshove M; Moritz T; Kirstein U
    Cytometry A; 2005 Aug; 66(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 15973698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of airflow rates and operator activity on containment of bacterial aerosols in a class II safety cabinet.
    Macher JM; First MW
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1984 Sep; 48(3):481-5. PubMed ID: 6437327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of four bioaerosol samplers in the outdoor environment.
    Cage BR; Schreiber K; Barnes C; Portnoy J
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 1996 Nov; 77(5):401-6. PubMed ID: 8933779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evolution of microbiological safety cabinets.
    Collins CH; Kennedy DA
    Br J Biomed Sci; 1999; 56(3):161-9. PubMed ID: 10824323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of cross-contamination control in biological safety cabinet for biotech/pharmaceutical manufacturing process.
    Hu SC; Shiue A; Tu JX; Liu HY; Chiu RB
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2015 Dec; 22(23):19264-72. PubMed ID: 26257118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating containment effectiveness of A2 and B2 biological safety cabinets.
    Taylor AV; Baker N; Hulsey M; Bennett CC; Meiners M; Gonzales BA
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2019 Apr; 76(9):599-607. PubMed ID: 31361829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source.
    Witschger O; Grinshpun SA; Fauvel S; Basso G
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jun; 48(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 15191944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fluid dynamics of cytotoxic safety cabinets.
    Braconnier R; Bonthoux F
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Mar; 54(2):236-46. PubMed ID: 20007340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance of open-fronted microbiological safety cabinets: the value of operator protection tests during routine servicing.
    Osborne R; Durkin T; Shannon H; Dornan E; Hughes C
    J Appl Microbiol; 1999 Jun; 86(6):962-70. PubMed ID: 10389245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A small change in the design of a slit bioaerosol impactor significantly improves its collection characteristics.
    Grinshpun SA; Adhikari A; Cho SH; Kim KY; Lee T; Reponen T
    J Environ Monit; 2007 Aug; 9(8):855-61. PubMed ID: 17671667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biological safety cabinetry.
    Kruse RH; Puckett WH; Richardson JH
    Clin Microbiol Rev; 1991 Apr; 4(2):207-41. PubMed ID: 2070345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The testing of HEPA filters fitted to microbiological safety cabinets: a comparison of methods.
    Lach VH; Wright AE
    J Hosp Infect; 1981 Dec; 2(4):385-8. PubMed ID: 6175697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance of exhaust-protective (class I) biological 'safety' cabinets.
    Newsom SW
    J Clin Pathol; 1979 Jun; 32(6):576-83. PubMed ID: 469014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Elimination of mouse allergens in the working environment: assessment of individually ventilated cage systems and ventilated cabinets in the containment of mouse allergens.
    Gordon S; Fisher SW; Raymond RH
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2001 Aug; 108(2):288-94. PubMed ID: 11496249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microbiological safety cabinets: selection, installation, testing and use.
    Kennedy DA; Collins CH
    Br J Biomed Sci; 2000; 57(4):330-7. PubMed ID: 11204866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the commercial bacterial air samplers by the new bacterial aerosol generator.
    Furuhashi M; Miyamae T
    Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ; 1981 Mar; 28(1):7-21. PubMed ID: 7011587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.