These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6482407)

  • 1. Word recognition with segmented-alternated CVC words: a preliminary report on listeners with normal hearing.
    Wilson RH; Arcos JT; Jones HC
    J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Sep; 27(3):378-86. PubMed ID: 6482407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Word recognition with segmented-alternated CVC words: compact disc trials.
    Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1994 Jul; 5(4):255-8. PubMed ID: 7949298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Carhart Memorial Lecture, American Auditory Society, Salt Lake City, Utah 1996. Phoneme and word recognition for words in isolation and in sentences.
    Olsen WO; Van Tasell DJ; Speaks CE
    Ear Hear; 1997 Jun; 18(3):175-88. PubMed ID: 9201453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recognition Performance of Interrupted Monosyllabic Words: The Effects of Ten Interruption Locations.
    Wilson RH; Hamm HM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015; 26(7):670-7. PubMed ID: 26218055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of the Carrier Phrase on Word Recognition Performances by Younger and Older Listeners Using Two Stimulus Paradigms.
    Wilson RH; Sanchez VA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Jun; 31(6):412-441. PubMed ID: 31968207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of consonant-vowel intensity ratio on loudness of monosyllabic words.
    Orr SB; Montgomery AA; Healy EW; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Nov; 128(5):3105-13. PubMed ID: 21110606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spectral cues to perception of /d, n, l/ by normal- and impaired-hearing listeners.
    Revoile SG; Pickett JM; Kozma-Spytek L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Aug; 90(2 Pt 1):787-98. PubMed ID: 1939885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stop-consonant recognition for normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. II: Articulation index predictions.
    Dubno JR; Dirks DD; Schaefer AB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jan; 85(1):355-64. PubMed ID: 2921418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predicting word-recognition performance in noise by young listeners with normal hearing using acoustic, phonetic, and lexical variables.
    McArdle R; Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Jun; 19(6):507-18. PubMed ID: 19253783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing auditory capabilities in young children.
    Eisenberg LS; Martinez AS; Boothroyd A
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Sep; 71(9):1339-50. PubMed ID: 17604127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of consonant-vowel amplitude ratio in the recognition of voiceless stop consonants by listeners with hearing impairment.
    Sammeth CA; Dorman MF; Stearns CJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1999 Feb; 42(1):42-55. PubMed ID: 10025542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variables that influence the recognition performance of interrupted words: rise-fall shape and temporal location of the interruptions.
    Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014; 25(7):688-96. PubMed ID: 25365371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stop-consonant recognition for normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. I: The contribution of selected frequency regions.
    Dubno JR; Dirks DD; Ellison DE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jan; 85(1):347-54. PubMed ID: 2921417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Phoneme recognition by deaf individuals using the multichannel nucleus cochlear implant.
    Mülder HE; Van Olphen AF; Bosman A; Smoorenburg GF
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1992 Nov; 112(6):946-55. PubMed ID: 1481665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Consonant-vowel intensity ratios for maximizing consonant recognition by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Kennedy E; Levitt H; Neuman AC; Weiss M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Feb; 103(2):1098-114. PubMed ID: 9479764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Object-based attention modulates the discrimination of level increments in stop-consonant noise bursts.
    Espinoza-Varas B; Hilton J; Guo S
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0190956. PubMed ID: 29364931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Phoneme recognition in modulated maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1646-54. PubMed ID: 22978893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.