These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Two nations divided by a common purpose. Macilwain C Nature; 2012 Mar; 483(7389):247. PubMed ID: 22422223 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Biotechnology in Japan 1984--a mini-review. Part 2: Government agencies, universities and research institutes. Schmid R Naturwissenschaften; 1985 Oct; 72(10):534-8. PubMed ID: 4069227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Increased efforts to educate the British public about bioscience. Brown P Nat Med; 1998 Aug; 4(8):875. PubMed ID: 9701226 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Public sector funding in the UK. Owen DA Nat Biotechnol; 1998 May; 16 Suppl():64. PubMed ID: 9591278 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Public confidence in medical technology. Williams D Med Device Technol; 2002 Dec; 13(10):11-3. PubMed ID: 12575521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Boom time for British biotechnology? Dickson D Science; 1984 Apr; 224(4645):136-8. PubMed ID: 6701537 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. HIMA: an association's report. Comper A Surg Bus; 1980 Apr; 43(4):40-2. PubMed ID: 10318508 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. National Science Foundation. Digging for fresh ideas in the sandpit. Mervis J Science; 2009 May; 324(5931):1128-9. PubMed ID: 19478152 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Double agents. Interview by Maura Thompson. Hutton J; Armstrong H Health Serv J; 2000 Jun; Suppl():6-7. PubMed ID: 11183829 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Communicating science: from the laboratory bench to the breakfast table. Hendrix MJ; Campbell PW Anat Rec; 2001 Aug; 265(4):165-7. PubMed ID: 11519017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Testimony of the Industrial Biotechnology Association before the Subcommittees on Natural Resources, Agriculture Research and Environment; Science, Research and Technology; and Investigations and Oversight of the Committee on Science and Technology, House of Representatives, July 23, 1986. Godown R Recomb DNA Tech Bull; 1986 Sep; 9(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 3786832 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. UK science budget: environment benefits in UK. Aldhous P Nature; 1990 Jan; 343(6255):199. PubMed ID: 2300156 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Advising the government. The dismissal of a senior science advisor in the UK has lead to a debate on the role of expert advice in crafting public policy. Nat Cell Biol; 2010 Jan; 12(1):1. PubMed ID: 20027194 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Industry--an NHS perspective. Trotman RE J Med Eng Technol; 1987; 11(5):220-3. PubMed ID: 3694648 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Patent protection for medical technologies: why some and not others? Melzer D Lancet; 1998 Feb; 351(9101):518-9. PubMed ID: 9482467 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. UK set to allow research on embryonic stem cells. Louët S Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Oct; 18(10):1034. PubMed ID: 11017032 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Editorial: R and D for better medical care. Brown JH Ann Biomed Eng; 1976 Jun; 4(2):109-10. PubMed ID: 937778 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Public policy toward environment 1973: a review and appraisal. Environmental information. Rubin DM; Harris TH; Jones DW; Sachs DP; Schoenfeld CA Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1973 May; 216():171-7. PubMed ID: 4513872 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Medicine and public affairs: Kennedy urges further pharmaceutical regulation. Greenberg DS N Engl J Med; 1974 May; 290(21):1211-2. PubMed ID: 4824024 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]