BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6484186)

  • 1. Oral contrast agents in CT of the abdomen.
    Garrett PR; Meshkov SL; Perlmutter GS
    Radiology; 1984 Nov; 153(2):545-6. PubMed ID: 6484186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of barium and diatrizoate bowel labelling agents in computed tomography.
    Carr DH; Banks LM
    Br J Radiol; 1985 May; 58(689):393-4. PubMed ID: 4063689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prospective randomized trial of iohexol 350 versus meglumine sodium diatrizoate as an oral contrast agent for abdominopelvic computed tomography.
    Peterson CM; Lin M; Pilgram T; Heiken JP
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(2):202-5. PubMed ID: 21412090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Telebrix: a better-tasting oral contrast agent for abdominal computed tomography.
    Bach DB
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 1991 Apr; 42(2):98-101. PubMed ID: 2039963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contrast medium precipitation during abdominal CT.
    Ball DS; Radecki PD; Friedman AC; Caroline DF; Mayer DP
    Radiology; 1986 Jan; 158(1):258-60. PubMed ID: 3940390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The use of contrast medium in the diagnosis of small intestine occlusion (author's transl)].
    Benendo-Kapuścińska B; Przybylska E
    Pol Przegl Radiol Med Nukl; 1980; 44(6):419-25. PubMed ID: 7255233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of "Gastromiro" for bowel opacification during computed tomography: comparison with diatrizoate and barium sulphate.
    Doyle GJ; O'Donnell SC; McDonald JR; Murthy LN; Keir MJ; Wright AR
    Br J Radiol; 1993 Aug; 66(788):681-4. PubMed ID: 7719680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Contrast enhancement].
    Wójtowicz J
    Pol Przegl Radiol Med Nukl; 1982; 46(4):179-86. PubMed ID: 6763211
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pretreatment of patients requiring oral contrast abdominal computed tomography with antiemetics: a randomized controlled trial of efficacy.
    Garra G; Singer AJ; Bamber D; Chohan J; Troxell R; Thode HC
    Ann Emerg Med; 2009 Apr; 53(4):528-33. PubMed ID: 18640743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Oral administration of intravenous contrast media: a tasty alternative to conventional oral contrast media in computed tomography].
    Diederichs G; Franiel T; Asbach P; Romano V; Hamm B; Rogalla P
    Rofo; 2007 Oct; 179(10):1061-7. PubMed ID: 17786895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gastrografin versus dilute barium for colonic CT examination: a blind, randomized study.
    Mitchell DG; Bjorgvinsson E; terMeulen D; Lane P; Greberman M; Friedman AC
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1985; 9(3):451-3. PubMed ID: 3989036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Non-absorbable fat-dense oral contrast agent for abdominal computed tomography.
    Zwaan M; Gmelin E; Borgis KJ; Rinast E
    Eur J Radiol; 1992; 14(3):189-91. PubMed ID: 1563426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Oral administration of contrast medium for rectal opacification in pelvic computed tomography.
    Mintz MC; Seltzer SE
    J Comput Tomogr; 1984 Jan; 8(1):73-4. PubMed ID: 6692687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Positive and negative oral contrast agents for combined abdominal and pelvic helical CT: first iodinated agent and second water.
    Matsuoka Y; Masumoto T; Koga H; Suzuki K; Ushimi T; Terada H; Tamura A; Yokoyama Y; Abe K; Kamata N
    Radiat Med; 2000; 18(3):213-6. PubMed ID: 10972554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of dilute barium and dilute water-soluble contrast in opacification of the bowel for abdominal computed tomography.
    Chambers SE; Best JJ
    Clin Radiol; 1984 Nov; 35(6):463-4. PubMed ID: 6499385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of iohexol 300 and diatrizoate meglumine 60 for body CT: image quality, adverse reactions, and aborted/repeated examinations.
    Bernardino ME; Fishman EK; Jeffrey RB; Brown PC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Mar; 158(3):665-7. PubMed ID: 1739017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of Oral Contrast in Abdominal/Pelvic CT Scans.
    Kielar A; Macdonald B; Krishna S
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2021 Aug; 72(3):339-340. PubMed ID: 32936681
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Small bowel obstruction and the gastrografin challenge.
    D'Agostino R; Ali NS; Leshchinskiy S; Cherukuri AR; Tam JK
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 Nov; 43(11):2945-2954. PubMed ID: 29632988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. CT detection of benign and malignant abnormalities of the small bowel.
    Schnyder PA; Candardjis G
    Eur J Radiol; 1983 Feb; 3(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 6840103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pancreas imaging by computed tomography after endoscopic retrograde pancreatography.
    Frick MP; O'Leary JF; Salomonowitz E; Stoltenberg P; Hutton S; Gedgaudas E
    Radiology; 1984 Jan; 150(1):191-4. PubMed ID: 6689759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.