These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6484238)

  • 1. [Analysis of the reasons for the rejection of radiographic films in radiodiagnosis].
    Belletti S; Gallini R; Giugni U
    Radiol Med; 1984; 70(1-2):46-9. PubMed ID: 6484238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Control of the stability of conditions in photochemical processing of radiographic films. Ministry of Health and Medical Industry of the Russian Federation].
    Chikirdin EG; Zakharova VI
    Med Tekh; 1996; (5):10-2. PubMed ID: 8992176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Analysis of reject x-ray films as a quality assurance element in diagnostic radiology].
    Lewentat G; Bohndorf K
    Rofo; 1997 May; 166(5):376-81. PubMed ID: 9198508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Control of film processing and dark room lighting].
    von Volkmann T
    Strahlenschutz Forsch Prax; 1986; 27():54-66. PubMed ID: 3705127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Assessment of the quality of radiographic medical films and chemicals for photochemical treatment].
    Larionov VN; Leont'ev VG; Kalashnikova LN
    Med Tekh; 2001; (6):31-4. PubMed ID: 11837193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An audit of rejected repeated x-ray films as a quality assurance element in a radiology department.
    Eze KC; Omodia N; Okegbunam B; Adewonyi T; Nzotta CC
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2008 Dec; 11(4):355-8. PubMed ID: 19320410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Problems with film processing in medical X-ray imaging in Lithuania.
    Sniureviciute M; Adliene D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):260-3. PubMed ID: 15933118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of an image quality assurance program.
    Göthlin JH; Alders B
    Eur J Radiol; 1985 Aug; 5(3):228-30. PubMed ID: 4029161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality assurance: 2. The image receptor, the darkroom and processing.
    Horner K
    Dent Update; 1992 Apr; 19(3):120, 122-4, 126. PubMed ID: 1291369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Results of a program of quality control in radiodiagnosis].
    Belletti S; Catolla Cavalcanti R; Gallini R; Giugni U
    Radiol Med; 1983 Apr; 69(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 6856887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Features of the maintenance of automated developing machines].
    Koveshnikov AI
    Med Tekh; 1999; (2):28-33. PubMed ID: 10335507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Assuring image quality in roentgen diagnostic services--information on DIN 6868. Part 2. Film processing: evaluating the uniformity of visual optic density].
    Becker-Gaab C; Borcke E; Bunde E; Hagemann G; Kütterer G; Lang GR; Schöfer H; Stender HS; Stieve FE; von Volkmann T
    Rontgenpraxis; 1987 Feb; 40(2):43-50. PubMed ID: 3576371
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. X-ray technician error may be wasting film.
    Wagner M
    Mod Healthc; 1992 Jul; 22(30):76. PubMed ID: 10119593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Practical quality assurance in x-ray diagnosis (author's transl)].
    Stender HS
    Rontgenblatter; 1980 Dec; 33(12):618-25. PubMed ID: 7455537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Maintenance of automatic dental film processors.
    Thunthy KH
    LDA J; 1996; 55(4):12-3. PubMed ID: 9569822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Film retakes in digital and conventional radiography.
    Akhtar W; Aslam M; Ali A; Mirza K; Ahmad N
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2008 Mar; 18(3):151-3. PubMed ID: 18460242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optical density changes in dry-processed films.
    Al Khalifah K; Brindhaban A; Al Baloul G; Al Bather F; Abdulgafoor M
    Radiol Technol; 2007; 79(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 17848529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinically acceptable tolerance of roentgen generator exposure parameters.
    Forsberg H
    Acta Radiol; 1987; 28(1):121-7. PubMed ID: 2952133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The influence of the spectrum and the type of exposure on the contrast of double-sided coated x-ray film].
    Blendl C; Bollen R; Freytag KH
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1992 Nov; 2(6):339-44. PubMed ID: 1457475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A quality study of 35 mm, miniaturization of full-size radiographic film.
    Göthlin JH; Gadeholt G
    Eur J Radiol; 1988 Feb; 8(1):62-3. PubMed ID: 3356200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.