These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6485175)
1. [Abortion and sterilization in the United States: demographic dynamics]. Sweeney PJ Union Med Can; 1984 Jul; 113(7):587-93. PubMed ID: 6485175 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Abortion and sterilization. Status of the law in mid-1970. Hershey N Am J Nurs; 1970 Sep; 70(9):1926-7. PubMed ID: 5200979 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Federal provider conscience regulation: unconscionable. Card R J Med Ethics; 2009 Aug; 35(8):471-2. PubMed ID: 19644003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Public support for pro-choice abortion policies in the nation and states: changes and stability after the Roe and Doe decisions. Uslaner EM; Weber RE Mich Law Rev; 1979 Aug; 77(7):1772-89. PubMed ID: 10245971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Liberalization of abortions and female sterilizations. Potts DM Can Med Assoc J; 1971 Nov; 105(9):901. PubMed ID: 5150189 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Religious discrimination in the selection of medical students: a case study. Gunn AE; Zenner GO Issues Law Med; 1996; 11(4):363-78. PubMed ID: 8934858 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Abortion: issues of access, policy, rights continue to be tested. Bernstein AH Hospitals; 1980 Feb; 54(3):28-30. PubMed ID: 7351319 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Wrongful birth: how much is it worth not to be born? Goldman EB Mich Hosp; 1983 Mar; 19(3):25, 27-8. PubMed ID: 10258815 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Legal trends in bioethics. Forster HP J Clin Ethics; 1999; 10(2):156-65. PubMed ID: 10633287 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Maintaining access to safe abortion in the United States: a post-Gonzales primer and guide to action. Jordan B; Pace L Contraception; 2007 Sep; 76(3):179-81. PubMed ID: 17707713 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Private religious hospitals: limitations upon autonomous moral choices in reproductive medicine. Bassett WW J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2001; 17(2):455-583. PubMed ID: 11475568 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Access declines. Reproductive services fall with hospital consolidation. Bellandi D Mod Healthc; 1998 Apr; 28(16):26. PubMed ID: 10179138 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. HIV positive women and reproductive choice. Stoll K Pa Nurse; 1993 Jun; 48(6):5. PubMed ID: 8321556 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Changed abortion policy in the USA will result in increased maternal mortality globally]. Molin A; Nordström A; Bergström S Lakartidningen; 2001 May; 98(22):2727-8. PubMed ID: 11430232 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Women's reproductive choices: the impact of Medicaid funding restrictions. Haas-Wilson D Fam Plann Perspect; 1997; 29(5):228-33. PubMed ID: 9323500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An equal protection analysis of United States reproductive health policy: gender, race, age, and class. Colker R Duke Law J; 1991 Apr; (2):324-64. PubMed ID: 10114913 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Abortion services and President Clinton's health plan: two views ... no, abortion isn't a health care service. Casey RP J Am Health Policy; 1993; 3(4):27, 29, 31. PubMed ID: 10127495 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]