These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6487723)

  • 1. Testing the effect of sex differences on sib-sib correlations.
    Donner A; Koval JJ; Bull S
    Biometrics; 1984 Jun; 40(2):349-56. PubMed ID: 6487723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Test for equality of intraclass correlation coefficients under unequal family sizes.
    Young DJ; Bhandary M
    Biometrics; 1998 Dec; 54(4):1363-73. PubMed ID: 9883539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of four sib-pair linkage methods for analyzing sibships with more than two affecteds: interest of the binomial maximum likelihood approach.
    Abel L; Alcais A; Mallet A
    Genet Epidemiol; 1998; 15(4):371-90. PubMed ID: 9671987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Testing hypotheses about interclass correlations from familial data.
    Konishi S
    Biometrics; 1985 Mar; 41(1):167-76. PubMed ID: 4005373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of excluding sib matings on inbreeding coefficient and effective size of finite diploid populations.
    Wang J
    Biometrics; 1997 Dec; 53(4):1354-65. PubMed ID: 9423254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Where is the likelihood ratio test powerful for detecting two component normal mixtures?
    Mendell NR; Finch SJ; Thode HC
    Biometrics; 1993 Sep; 49(3):907-15. PubMed ID: 8241377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The information contained in multiple sibling pairs.
    Hodge SE
    Genet Epidemiol; 1984; 1(2):109-22. PubMed ID: 6599401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interval estimation and significance testing for cyclic trends in seasonality studies.
    Nam JM
    Biometrics; 1995 Dec; 51(4):1411-7. PubMed ID: 8589231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Testing for treatment effect in the presence of regression toward the mean.
    George V; Johnson WD; Shahane A; Nick TG
    Biometrics; 1997 Mar; 53(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 9147603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Properties of alternative estimators of familial correlations under variable sibship size.
    Vogler GP; Wette R; McGue MK; Rao DC
    Biometrics; 1995 Mar; 51(1):276-83. PubMed ID: 7766782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Maximum-Likelihood-Binomial method for genetic model-free linkage analysis of quantitative traits in sibships.
    Alcaïs A; Abel L
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17(2):102-17. PubMed ID: 10414555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of path analysis through computer simulation: effect of incorrectly assuming independent distribution of familial correlations.
    McGue M; Wette R; Rao DC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1984; 1(3):255-69. PubMed ID: 6544240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Affected-sib-pair test for linkage based on constraints for identical-by-descent distributions corresponding to disease models with imprinting.
    Knapp M; Strauch K
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 May; 26(4):273-85. PubMed ID: 15095387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficient use of siblings in testing for linkage and association.
    Rieger RH; Kaplan NL; Weinberg CR
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Feb; 20(2):175-91. PubMed ID: 11180445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A family study of anthropometric traits in a Punjabi community: I. Introduction and familial correlations.
    Sharma K; Byard PJ; Russell JM; Rao DC
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1984 Apr; 63(4):389-95. PubMed ID: 6539571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical validity of the Haseman-Elston sib-pair test in small samples.
    Wilson AF; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1993; 10(6):593-8. PubMed ID: 8314066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Power comparisons between the TDT and two likelihood-based methods.
    Slager SL; Huang J; Vieland VJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Feb; 20(2):192-209. PubMed ID: 11180446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Methods for testing equality of means of health care costs in a paired design study.
    Zhou XH; Li C; Gao S; Tierney WM
    Stat Med; 2001 Jun; 20(11):1703-20. PubMed ID: 11391697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Superiority inferences on individual endpoints following noninferiority testing in clinical trials.
    Logan BR; Tamhane AC
    Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):693-703. PubMed ID: 18932132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variance components testing in the longitudinal mixed effects model.
    Stram DO; Lee JW
    Biometrics; 1994 Dec; 50(4):1171-7. PubMed ID: 7786999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.