These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6487848)

  • 21. [Importance of auditory "screening" in the school and preschool environment in relation to language disorders].
    Dutoit-Marco ML
    Soz Praventivmed; 1983; 28(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 6682605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Correlation between tone and speech audiometry (author's transl)].
    Neuss O
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1982; 234(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 7115200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Spontaneous improvement in ears with middle ear disease.
    Renvall U; Aniansson G; Lidén G
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 1982 Aug; 4(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 7118451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Efficiency of speech audiometry and other tests.
    Hagerman B
    Br J Audiol; 1993 Dec; 27(6):423-5. PubMed ID: 8054900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accuracy of cortical evoked response audiometry in the identification of non-organic hearing loss.
    Tsu B; Wong LL; Wong EC
    Int J Audiol; 2002 Sep; 41(6):330-3. PubMed ID: 12353605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Communicative ability in an audiological perspective. Theory and application to post-secondary school students.
    Borg E; Samuelsson E; Danermark B; Rönnberg J
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1999; 50():i-iv, 1-36. PubMed ID: 10810771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparative study of hearing screening procedures.
    FitzZaland RE; Zink GD
    Ear Hear; 1984; 5(4):205-10. PubMed ID: 6468778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Guidelines for audiometric symbols. Committee on Audiologic Evaluation. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
    ASHA Suppl; 1990 Apr; (2):25-30. PubMed ID: 1970250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A study of the recommended pass/fail criteria for impedance audiometry in a school screening program.
    McKenzie E; Magian V; Stokes R
    J Otolaryngol; 1982 Feb; 11(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 7200525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Audiological evaluation.
    Møller MB
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 1994 May; 11(3):309-18. PubMed ID: 8089203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Five years' experience of combined impedance and audiometric screening at school entry.
    Bonny IC
    Public Health; 1989 Nov; 103(6):427-31. PubMed ID: 2608870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Screening for hearing disorders in school children of Medellin, Colombia, 1993].
    Rodríguez MA; Melguizo-Yepez M
    Salud Publica Mex; 1994; 36(6):670-2. PubMed ID: 7892643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Alternatives in screening at school entry: comparison of the childhood middle ear disease and hearing questionnaire (CMEDHQ) and the pure tone sweep test.
    Hind SE; Atkins RL; Haggard MP; Brady D; Grinham G
    Br J Audiol; 1999 Dec; 33(6):403-14. PubMed ID: 10656601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Contralateral acoustic reflex thresholds for tonal activators using wideband energy reflectance and admittance.
    Feeney MP; Keefe DH; Marryott LP
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2003 Feb; 46(1):128-36. PubMed ID: 12647893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Diagnosis of speech and hearing disorders in children with the aid of play tonal audiometry].
    Liakh GS
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1980; (5):70-3. PubMed ID: 7414834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Immittance screening for aural problems in school children.
    McDermott JC
    J Sch Health; 1982 Oct; 52(8):462-8. PubMed ID: 6923958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Criteria for detection of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions in schoolchildren.
    Trzaskowski B; Pilka E; Jedrzejczak WW; Skarzynski H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Sep; 79(9):1455-61. PubMed ID: 26166450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Audiometric screening of a population with intellectual disability.
    Andersson E; Arlinger S; Magnusson L; Hamrin E
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jan; 52(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 23110674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Impedance measures and pure-tone screening of college students.
    Lape MH; Sheeley EC; Hannah JE
    J Aud Res; 1980 Oct; 20(4):307-15. PubMed ID: 7349309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Topodiagnostic assessment of occupational noise-induced hearing loss using distortion-product otoacoustic emissions compared to the short increment sensitivity index test.
    Oeken J
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1999; 256(3):115-21. PubMed ID: 10234478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.