These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6487849)

  • 1. Effects of high-pass filtering on the detection of the auditory brainstem response.
    Mason SM
    Br J Audiol; 1984 Aug; 18(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 6487849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of click-evoked auditory brainstem responses using time domain cross-correlations between interleaved responses.
    Berninger E; Olofsson A; Leijon A
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):318-29. PubMed ID: 24557002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Frequency-specific auditory brainstem responses to clicks masked by notched noise.
    van Zanten GA; Brocaar MP
    Audiology; 1984; 23(3):253-64. PubMed ID: 6732630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Objective detection of averaged auditory brainstem responses.
    Don M; Elberling C; Waring M
    Scand Audiol; 1984; 13(4):219-28. PubMed ID: 6523040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditory brainstem responses to middle- and low-frequency tone pips.
    Maurizi M; Paludetti G; Ottaviani F; Rosignoli M
    Audiology; 1984; 23(1):75-84. PubMed ID: 6704061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Highpass filtering of auditory evoked brain stem potentials (author's transl)].
    Kiessling J; Althaus V
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1981; 230(2):149-59. PubMed ID: 7295174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The choice of stimulus in the auditory brainstem response test for neurological and audiological examinations.
    Suzuki J; Yamane H
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1982; 388():731-6. PubMed ID: 6953910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Effect of stimulus rise time and high-pass masking on early auditory evoked potentials].
    Bunke D; von Specht H; Mühler R; Pethe J; Kevanishvili Z
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Apr; 77(4):185-90. PubMed ID: 9592750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digital filtering and spectral analysis of the low intensity ABR.
    Kavanagh KT; Domico WD; Franks R; Han JC
    Ear Hear; 1988 Feb; 9(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 3342945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On-line computer scoring of the auditory brainstem response for estimation of hearing threshold.
    Mason SM
    Audiology; 1984; 23(3):277-96. PubMed ID: 6732632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Brainstem responses to tone pip and click stimuli.
    Bauch CD; Rose DE; Harner SG
    Ear Hear; 1980; 1(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 7409354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The current status of auditory brainstem response testing in neonatal populations.
    Cox LC
    Pediatr Res; 1984 Aug; 18(8):780-3. PubMed ID: 6472950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of change of stimulus frequency on the prediction of audiograms.
    Jerger J; Hayes D
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1982; 388():729-30. PubMed ID: 6953909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Derived acoustically evoked brainstem responses by means of narrow-band and notched-noise masking in normal-hearing subjects.
    Thümmler I; Tietze G
    Scand Audiol; 1984; 13(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 6463552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory brainstem and middle latency responses. I. Effect of response filtering and waveform identification. II. Threshold responses to a 500-HZ tone pip.
    Kavanagh KT; Harker LA; Tyler RS
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1984; 108():1-12. PubMed ID: 6421220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Threshold prediction from the auditory 40-Hz evoked potential.
    Lynn JM; Lesner SA; Sandridge SA; Daddario CC
    Ear Hear; 1984; 5(6):366-70. PubMed ID: 6510584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Frequency-specific auditory brainstem responses. Effective masking levels and relationship to behavioural thresholds in normal hearing adults.
    Purdy SC; Houghton JM; Keith WJ; Greville KA
    Audiology; 1989; 28(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 2930366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Establishing normal hearing with the dichotic multiple-frequency auditory steady-state response compared to an auditory brainstem response protocol.
    Swanepoel D; Schmulian D; Hugo R
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2004 Jan; 124(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 14977080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The indication for brain stem evoked response and the effect of click rate and stimulus intensity on the latencies of the auditory evoked potentials (author's transl)].
    Baschek V; Steinert W
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1980 Oct; 59(10):690-7. PubMed ID: 7453423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Steady state auditory evoked potentials in normal hearing subjects: evaluation of threshold and testing time.
    Picciotti PM; Giannantonio S; Paludetti G; Conti G
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2012; 74(6):310-4. PubMed ID: 23258317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.