These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6488724)

  • 21. Evaluation of catheter-mounted transducers for intra-oesophageal pressure recording in respiratory function tests.
    Peters RJ; Meijer JH; Kingma R; Scheffer GJ; Heethaar RM
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 1998 Sep; 36(5):562-7. PubMed ID: 10367438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Oesophageal peristalsis. A simple system for the recording of oesophageal peristalsis, and the influence of bolus volume on peak peristaltic pressure amplitude.
    Boesby S; Söndergaard EY; Madsen T
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 1978; 13(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 635456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Measurement of pleural pressure with oesophageal catheter-tip micromanometer in anaesthetized humans.
    Chartrand DA; Jodoin C; Couture J
    Can J Anaesth; 1991 May; 38(4 Pt 1):518-21. PubMed ID: 2065421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of air-coupled balloon esophageal and anorectal manometry catheters with solid-state esophageal manometry and water-perfused anorectal manometry catheters.
    Fang JC; Hilden K; Tuteja AK; Peterson KA
    Dig Dis Sci; 2004 Oct; 49(10):1657-63. PubMed ID: 15573923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Oesophageal manometry by liquid-filled catheters.
    Shaw A; Baillie AD; Runcie J
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 1980 Jul; 18(4):488-92. PubMed ID: 7421342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Intraluminal pressure measurements at the esophago-gastric junction and at the distal esophagus in healthy adults].
    Heitmann P; Möller N
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1970 Sep; 95(39):1963-9. PubMed ID: 5458696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Pancreatitis following bile duct sphincter of Oddi manometry: utility of the aspirating catheter.
    Sherman S; Hawes RH; Troiano FP; Lehman GA
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1992; 38(3):347-50. PubMed ID: 1376705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Technical aspects of clinical high-resolution manometry studies.
    Bredenoord AJ; Hebbard GS
    Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2012 Mar; 24 Suppl 1():5-10. PubMed ID: 22248102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effect of HCl infusion in the lower part of the oesophagus on the pharyngo-oesophageal sphincter pressure in normal subjects.
    Wallin L; Boesby S; Madsen T
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 1978; 13(7):821-6. PubMed ID: 725504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Pressure signal transmission of five commercially available oesophageal balloon catheters.
    Buscher H; Valta P; Sydow M; Thies K; Burchardi H
    Intensive Care Med; 2000 Apr; 26(4):462-5. PubMed ID: 10872140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Influence of the catheter diameter on the manometric measurements of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES); with special reference to the application for children].
    Iino M; Takahashi H; Maie M; Oonuma N; Nagai Y; Aoyagi H; Iwai J
    Nihon Heikatsukin Gakkai Zasshi; 1983 Oct; 19(5):415-22. PubMed ID: 6678987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A catheter withdrawing apparatus for clinical urethral pressure profile studies.
    Lowe PJ; Saunders GA; Downie JW; Awad SA
    J Urol; 1976 Nov; 116(5):636-8. PubMed ID: 978817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Methodical studies on pressure measurements in the esophagus].
    Waldeck F; Jennewein HM; Graubner P
    Leber Magen Darm; 1972 Jan; 2(1):14-6. PubMed ID: 5075969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Laboratory comparison of urethral profilometry techniques.
    Teague CT; Merrill DC
    Urology; 1979 Feb; 13(2):221-8. PubMed ID: 571164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Study of threee urethral pressure recording devices: theoretical considerations.
    Jonas U; Klotter HJ
    Urol Res; 1978; 6(3):119-25. PubMed ID: 568336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Measurement of intracompartmental pressure: a comparison of the slit catheter, side-ported needle, and simple needle.
    Moed BR; Thorderson PK
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1993 Feb; 75(2):231-5. PubMed ID: 8423183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Pressure integrating transducer for oesophageal manometry.
    Ask P; Oberg PA
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 1979 May; 17(3):360-4. PubMed ID: 317333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Disposable balloon-based oesophageal motility catheters: comparison with solid-state transducers.
    Tutuian R; Agrawal A; Mainie I; Freeman J; Castell DO
    Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2005 Jun; 17(3):453-7. PubMed ID: 15916633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Oesophageal Manometry in Experimental Pigs: Methods and Initial Experience.
    Tachecí I; Radochová V; Květina J; Rejchrt S; Kopáčová M; Bureš J
    Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove); 2015; 58(4):131-4. PubMed ID: 26960826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The present status of esophageal manometry.
    Wienbeck M
    Acta Hepatogastroenterol (Stuttg); 1976 Feb; 23(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 1258604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.